Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.90B | $30.15B | $7.03B | $5.88B | $2.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $0.00 | $51M | $0.00 | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-243M | $-1.37B | $-315M | $-464M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 98.0% | — | 33.2% | — | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | -102.9% | — | -7.0% | — | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $346M | $159M | $82M | $98K | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $384M | $357M | $714M | $222M |
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syndax Pharmaceutic… (SNDX) | 100 | 131.8 | +31.8% |
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 500.4 | +400.4% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 269.8 | +169.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.69
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth 11.8%
- Beta 0.69, current ratio 4.40x
- 6.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -97.8%
RVMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 390.7% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 7.14x
- +238.4% vs SNDX's +95.2%
KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- -22.3% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -54.3%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 3.2% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -97.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs RCUS's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +238.4% vs SNDX's +95.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -54.3% |
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNDX leads in 1 of 6 categories
RCUS leads 1 • KYMR leads 1 • RVMD leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -112.0% (SNDX) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, SNDX holds the edge at +2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $0 | $51M | $0 | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$218M | -$1.4B | -$352M | -$487M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$243M | -$1.4B | -$315M | -$464M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$278M | -$1.1B | -$244M | -$423M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.0% | — | +33.2% | — | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -102.9% | — | -7.0% | — | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -112.0% | — | -6.1% | — | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -128.2% | — | -4.7% | — | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | — | +55.5% | — | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -102.7% | +13.4% | +19.7% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $30.1B | $7.0B | $5.9B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $29.9B | $6.8B | $5.2B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.53x | -23.83x | -23.33x | -10.60x | -7.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.00x | — | 179.28x | — | 10.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.80x | 16.53x | 4.60x | 6.20x | 4.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SNDX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNDX's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -83.2% | -25.0% | -47.1% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.2% | -59.1% | -22.3% | -44.1% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.2% | -54.3% | -24.9% | — | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.0% | -53.0% | -27.2% | -66.1% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.36x | 0.10x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $212M | -$225M | -$275M | -$714M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $384M | $357M | $714M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $346M | $159M | $82M | $98,000 | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.31x | -81.62x | -2119.53x | — | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RVMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RVMD five years ago would be worth $47,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,787 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RVMD leads with a +238.4% total return vs SNDX's +95.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVMD at 79.7% vs SNDX's 1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +79.5% | +18.3% | +11.7% | +8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +95.2% | +238.4% | +179.8% | +102.4% | +197.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +480.2% | +210.3% | +49.8% | +27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +375.9% | +95.8% | +84.4% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.1% | +390.7% | +158.8% | +190.9% | +49.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | +79.7% | +45.9% | +14.4% | +8.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNDX and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KYMR's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 1.01x | 1.03x | 1.36x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.58 | $155.70 | $103.00 | $30.09 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.58 | $34.00 | $28.06 | $13.36 | $7.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.0% | +91.1% | +83.6% | +96.2% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 58.1 | 50.5 | 50.6 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.9M | 583K | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNDX as "Buy", RVMD as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.1% upside for SNDX (target: $42) vs 11.3% for RVMD (target: $158).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.50 | $157.80 | $118.06 | $45.50 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 22 | 26 | 23 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SNDX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RCUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SNDX vs RVMD vs KYMR vs IMVT vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the stronger pick with 627. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SNDX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) delivered a total return of +375. 9%, compared to -12. 1% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVMD returned +390. 7% versus RCUS's +49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning RCUS is approximately 167% more volatile than SNDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is pulling ahead at 627. 8% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS?
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RVMD leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SNDX or RVMD or KYMR or IMVT or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNDX: +50. 1%, RCUS: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SNDX and RVMD and KYMR and IMVT and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.