Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Asset Management | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $251M | $243M | $234M | $392M | $2.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344.59B | $97M | $199M | $451M | $2.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-12M | $41M | $34M | $116M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% | 57.7% | 37.7% | 87.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% | 25.6% | 9.7% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 6.5x | 7.0x | 9.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M | $4M | $8M | $891M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $20M | $12M | $66M | $322M |
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security National F… (SNFCA) | 100 | 190.0 | +90.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Kingstone Companies… (KINS) | 100 | 367.3 | +267.3% |
| Global Indemnity Gr… (GBLI) | 100 | 112.5 | +12.5% |
| Stewart Information… (STC) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNFCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 209.4% 10Y total return vs KINS's 101.9%
- 42K% NII/revenue growth vs GBLI's 2.0%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 11.5x)
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- 50.6% margin vs STC's 4.0%
- 17.1% yield, vs STC's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +19.3% vs KINS's -10.1%
KINS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 94.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- PEG 0.06 vs TPVG's 6.41
- 9.8% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 46.6% vs 7.2%
GBLI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.14, yield 5.1%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.14 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, STC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42K% NII/revenue growth vs GBLI's 2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs STC's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs STC's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs KINS's -10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 46.6% vs 7.2% |
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KINS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SNFCA leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • GBLI leads 0 • STC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TPVG and STC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNFCA is the larger business by revenue, generating $344.6B annually — 3544.8x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STC's 4.0%. On growth, STC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344.6B | $97M | $199M | $451M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | -$22M | $54M | $48M | $227M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$12M | $41M | $34M | $116M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $35M | $73M | $7M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% | +57.7% | +37.7% | +87.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% | +25.6% | +9.7% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +50.6% | +20.5% | +7.4% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | -58.7% | +36.7% | +1.5% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -3.2% | +0.5% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.7% | -2.3% | +157.5% | +196.7% | +56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SNFCA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 72% valuation discount to STC's 17.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KINS offers better value at 0.06x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $251M | $243M | $234M | $392M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $691M | $226M | $335M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.86x | 4.91x | 5.61x | 15.60x | 17.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 7.03x | 9.71x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | 0.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x | 4.22x | 8.59x | 11.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 2.50x | 1.17x | 0.87x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.68x | 1.86x | 0.55x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.01x | — | 3.20x | 43.22x | 16.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS delivers a 40.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. GBLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KINS scores 7/9 vs SNFCA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | -3.4% | +40.0% | +0.0% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -1.5% | +9.8% | +0.0% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% | +46.6% | +3.8% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% | +20.3% | +4.4% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $449M | -$8M | -$57M | $569M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $20M | $12M | $66M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M | $4M | $8M | $891M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.24x | -1.02x | 115.65x | 16.91x | 8.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KINS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs KINS's -10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 127.2% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | -6.3% | -0.3% | -3.8% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.0% | +19.3% | -10.1% | +3.7% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.7% | -3.4% | +1073.4% | +11.6% | +79.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.9% | -13.5% | +99.4% | +12.5% | +28.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +93.3% | +101.9% | +17.7% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.5% | -1.2% | +127.2% | +3.7% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNFCA and GBLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GBLI is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNFCA currently trades 90.0% from its 52-week high vs KINS's 72.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.83x | 0.28x | 0.14x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $7.53 | $22.40 | $34.00 | $78.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.70 | $4.48 | $13.08 | $25.63 | $56.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +79.5% | +72.1% | +80.3% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 58.3 | 50.5 | 41.5 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 504K | 113K | 3K | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and STC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", KINS as "Buy", STC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 15.3% for STC (target: $81). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs KINS's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | — | — | $80.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 4 | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | +0.6% | +5.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | $0.10 | $1.40 | $2.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KINS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SNFCA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SNFCA vs TPVG vs KINS vs GBLI vs STC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the stronger pick with 42061% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2.
0% for Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Stewart Information Services Corporation at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNFCA returned +209. 4% versus GBLI's +17. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 503% more volatile than GBLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is pulling ahead at 42061% versus 2.
0% for Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 94. 6% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Global Indemnity Group, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, KINS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 4. 0% for Stewart Information Services Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for SNFCA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Stewart Information Services Corporation — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield), GBLI (5. 1% yield), STC (2. 9% yield), KINS (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SNFCA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNFCA or TPVG or KINS or GBLI or STC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GBLI: +17. 7%, SNFCA: +209. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNFCA and TPVG and KINS and GBLI and STC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNFCA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; KINS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GBLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; STC is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG, KINS, GBLI, STC pay a dividend while SNFCA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.