Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA)
Valuation Overview•Is Security National Financial Corporation Overvalued or Undervalued?
Popular:
Below average — notable weaknesses in key areas
| Quarter | EPS Est. | EPS Act. | Surprise | EPS | Rev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1'26Latest | — | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q4'25 | — | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3'25 | — | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q2'25 | — | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2'25 | — | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4'24 | — | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q3'24 | — | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q2'24 | — | $0.30 | — |
Total return, benchmark alpha, and annual history in one section.
3Y, 5Y, and 10Y use CAGR when available.
| Period | Return | vs S&P | Dividends |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | +14.1% | +7.0% | — |
| 1Y | -1.0% | -31.4% | — |
| 3YCAGR | +11.5% | -9.8% | — |
| 5YCAGR | +7.7% | -3.6% | — |
| 10YCAGR | +12.0% | -1.8% | — |
Year-by-year total return versus SPY, including dividend contribution.
| Year | Stock Return | SPY Return | Alpha | Dividends |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026YTD | +4.4% | +0.4% | +4.0% | — |
| 2025Worst | -26.3% | +16.6% | -42.9% | — |
| 2024 | +39.7% | +24.0% | +15.7% | — |
| 2023 | +29.3% | +24.8% | +4.4% | — |
| 2022 | -14.7% | -19.9% | +5.3% | — |
| 2021 | +13.9% | +28.8% | -14.9% | — |
| 2020Best | +52.7% | +15.1% | +37.6% | — |
| 2019 | +17.9% | +28.7% | -10.7% | — |
Based on our multi-model analysis of Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) at $9.90: Relative valuation verdict: Significantly Undervalued vs industry peers. Fundamental quality score: 36/100 (below average). This is a quantitative summary combining DCF intrinsic value, peer-based relative valuation, quality scoring, and analyst consensus — not a buy/sell recommendation. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before investing.
Security National Financial Corporation has multiple fair value estimates from different frameworks: Relative fair value: $12.16 (Significantly Undervalued, +35.1% vs current price). We recommend comparing all three lenses — when DCF, relative, and analyst targets converge, the signal is stronger. When they diverge, investigate what assumptions differ.
Security National Financial Corporation's financial health as measured by our composite scoring: Overall quality score: 36/100. Piotroski F-Score: 2/9 (weak fundamentals). Cash conversion (OCF/NI): 1.42x (earnings are cash-backed). The quality score blends profitability (ROIC, ROE, margins), solvency (leverage, coverage, Z-Score), and growth trajectory into a single 0–100 framework updated end-of-day.
Security National Financial Corporation's performance profile: 1-year total return: -1.0%. 1-year alpha vs S&P 500: -31.4% (underperforming the benchmark). 5-year CAGR: +7.7%. Maximum drawdown (1Y): -27.1%. Relative Strength rating: 68/99 (average momentum). Beta: 0.80 (similar volatility to the market). Total returns include reinvested dividends. Alpha is calculated against the S&P 500 Total Return Index over matching periods.
Security National Financial Corporation does not currently pay a dividend or conduct significant share buybacks. The company is retaining capital for reinvestment.
No analyst coverage data available for SNFCA.
Key risks identified for Security National Financial Corporation: Drawdown risk: The stock experienced a -27.1% max drawdown in the past year. Note: This model does not capture regulatory changes, management decisions, competitive disruption, or geopolitical events. Macro and qualitative risks remain material and should be assessed independently.
No. This overview dashboard aggregates data from our DCF intrinsic value model, relative peer multiples model, proprietary estimates engine, and third-party analyst consensus feeds. It is strictly for educational and informational purposes. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, quality scores, and signals are automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as investment recommendations. Consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance does not guarantee future results.