Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNX vs INGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
SNX vs INGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $18.77B | $6.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62.51B | $54.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $828M | $358M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.9x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.61B | $909M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.44B | $1.86B |
SNX vs INGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 201.5 | +101.5% |
| Ingram Micro Holdin… (INGM) | 100 | 110.8 | +10.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNX vs INGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 0.8%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs INGM's 10.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 54.6%, current ratio 1.21x
INGM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
- Beta 1.54, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.33x
- 9.5% revenue growth vs SNX's 6.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs SNX's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs INGM's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs INGM's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs INGM's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs INGM's +43.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs INGM's 1.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs 14.2% |
SNX vs INGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNX vs INGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNX and INGM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX and INGM operate at a comparable scale, with $62.5B and $54.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (SNX) to 0.7% (INGM). On growth, INGM holds the edge at +13.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62.5B | $54.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $828M | $358M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $979M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +13.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +44.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INGM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, INGM trades at a 17% valuation discount to SNX's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INGM's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNX's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.8B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.9B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.36x | 19.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.88x | 8.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.40x | 4.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.51x | 7.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INGM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNX delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for INGM. INGM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNX's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNX scores 6/9 vs INGM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | -$956M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $909M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,081 for INGM. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs INGM's +43.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs INGM's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.1% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.2% | +43.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.4% | +10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.2% | +10.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +505.0% | +10.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.3% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SNX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNX is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INGM's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs INGM's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $237.51 | $31.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $114.05 | $18.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.3 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 735K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SNX and INGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNX as "Buy" and INGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.2% upside for INGM (target: $29) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). For income investors, INGM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $177.00 | $28.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.78 | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.0% |
INGM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SNX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
SNX vs INGM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNX or INGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is the stronger pick with 9.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNX or INGM?
On trailing P/E, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus TD SYNNEX Corporation at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNX or INGM?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to +10. 8% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus INGM's +10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNX or INGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
43β versus Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's 1. 54β — meaning INGM is approximately 8% more volatile than SNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 55% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNX or INGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is pulling ahead at 9.
5% versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, INGM leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNX or INGM?
TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
3% net margin versus 0. 6% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNX leads at 2. 3% versus 1. 8% for INGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNX leads at 7. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNX or INGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for TD SYNNEX Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INGM: 7. 2% to $28. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNX or INGM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 8% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX).
09Is SNX or INGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNX: +505. 0%, INGM: +10. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNX and INGM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.