Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Equipment & Services
Travel Services
Leisure
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Equipment & Services | Travel Services | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.61B | $6.63B | $19M | $111M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $4.18B | $2.35B | $2M | $254M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-1.82B | $128M | $-15M | $-45M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 34.2% | 69.7% | -22.2% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | -4.1% | 4.6% | -6.0% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 5.6x | 51.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $28M | $3.97B | $1.12B | $568K | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $688K | $532M | $229M | $1M | $37M |
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNYR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 7.5% margin vs NTRP's -7.0%
- Beta 0.79 vs HIMS's 2.40
- 12.5% ROA vs NTRP's -123.7%, ROIC 88.1% vs -120.2%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs CLAR's 3.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs CLAR's -13.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs SNYR's -18.6%
NTRP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 7.7%, current ratio 0.96x
- +24.5% vs SNYR's -78.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CLAR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs SNYR's -18.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs NTRP's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs CLAR's 3.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs SNYR's -78.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NTRP's -123.7%, ROIC 88.1% vs -120.2% |
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNYR leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • HIMS leads 1 • NTRP leads 0 • CLAR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNYR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 1916.6x NTRP's $2M. SNYR is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRP's -7.0%. On growth, NTRP holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $4.2B | $2.3B | $2M | $254M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $58M | $164M | -$12M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$1.8B | $128M | -$15M | -$45M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $108M | $73M | -$4M | -$12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +34.2% | +69.7% | -22.2% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | -4.1% | +4.6% | -6.0% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | -43.5% | +5.5% | -7.0% | -17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +2.6% | +3.1% | -194.6% | -4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -7.2% | +28.4% | +15.1% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.6% | -56.4% | -27.3% | -5.7% | +35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, SNYR trades at a 97% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNYR's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.6B | $6.6B | $19M | $111M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $5.1B | $7.5B | $19M | $87M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.41x | -1.14x | 50.32x | -1.18x | -2.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.56x | 51.51x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.27x | 7.42x | 42.68x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.38x | 2.82x | 38.62x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.55x | 12.25x | 1.64x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.12x | 89.61x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNYR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NTRP. CLAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNYR scores 4/9 vs CLAR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -50.7% | +23.7% | -2.3% | -21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | -19.8% | +6.0% | -123.7% | -21.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +88.1% | +3.7% | +10.7% | -120.2% | -8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.3% | +10.9% | -160.4% | -17.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.35x | 2.07x | 0.08x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | $3.4B | $892M | -$494,837 | -$24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $687,920 | $532M | $229M | $1M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $4.0B | $1.1B | $567,530 | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | -7.20x | — | -10.16x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $377 for NTRP. Over the past 12 months, NTRP leads with a +24.5% total return vs SNYR's -78.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs NTRP's -32.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -79.0% | -13.5% | -23.2% | -22.2% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.8% | -51.2% | -51.0% | +24.5% | -12.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | -58.1% | +116.6% | -68.7% | -62.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | -60.1% | +137.6% | -96.2% | -82.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | -77.7% | +161.9% | -99.8% | -13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | -25.2% | +29.4% | -32.1% | -27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNYR and CLAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLAR currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs SNYR's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.18x | 2.40x | 1.06x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $28.44 | $70.43 | $5.20 | $4.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.30 | $9.23 | $13.74 | $1.72 | $2.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +41.2% | +36.4% | +50.7% | +71.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.0 | 60.9 | 54.5 | 42.6 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 3.4M | 34.9M | 79K | 217K |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRGO as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", CLAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 73.0% upside for CLAR (target: $5) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.81% vs CLAR's 3.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.00 | $29.67 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 19 | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.8% | — | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | — | — | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
SNYR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SNYR vs PRGO vs HIMS vs NTRP vs CLAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 6% for Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR). Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
On trailing P/E, Synergy CHC Corp.
(SNYR) is the cheapest at 1. 4x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -96. 2% for NextTrip, Inc. (NTRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus NTRP's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Synergy CHC Corp.
(SNYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 205% more volatile than SNYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clarus Corporation (CLAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -18. 6% for Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Synergy CHC Corp. grew EPS 297. 2% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
Synergy CHC Corp.
(SNYR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 1% net margin versus -20. 2% for NextTrip, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNYR leads at 16. 7% versus -1677. 9% for NTRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNYR leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 45. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLAR: 73. 0% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), CLAR (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SNYR, HIMS, NTRP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNYR or PRGO or HIMS or NTRP or CLAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNYR and PRGO and HIMS and NTRP and CLAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNYR (Healthcare) and PRGO (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and NTRP (Consumer Cyclical) and CLAR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SNYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO, CLAR pay a dividend while SNYR, HIMS, NTRP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.