SOJC vs EXC

For growth investors, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the stronger pick with 10.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exelon Corporation (EXC) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus Exelon Corporation at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 wins at 0. 70x versus Exelon Corporation's 2. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Exelon Corporation (EXC) delivered a total return of +61.

8%, compared to +5. 4% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXC returned +125. 0% versus SOJC's +30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

14β versus The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77's 0. 80β — meaning SOJC is approximately -669% more volatile than EXC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exelon Corporation (EXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 176% versus 194% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is pulling ahead at 10.

6% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelon Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

7% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOJC leads at 24. 7% versus 21. 2% for EXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOJC leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 70x versus Exelon Corporation's 2. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Exelon Corporation — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) offers the highest yield at 12. 5%, versus 3. 6% for Exelon Corporation (EXC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

14), 3. 6% yield, +125. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXC: +125. 0%, SOJC: +30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.