Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $12.41B | $9.04B | $55.53B | $11.97B | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.26B | $11.32B | $21.36B | $4.15B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.43B | $-1.10B | $1.14B | $401M | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 30.1% | 46.5% | 64.2% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | -2.7% | 10.6% | 17.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | 9.2x | 12.3x | 13.2x | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.04B | $10.00B | $19.18B | $2.78B | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $878M | $1.97B | $851M | $111M | $1.96B |
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Baxter Internationa… (BAX) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
| Becton, Dickinson a… (BDX) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
| The Cooper Companie… (COO) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOLV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 17.3% margin vs BAX's -9.7%
- 10.0% ROA vs BAX's -5.4%, ROIC 16.9% vs -1.4%
BAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 13.2x)
- 3.9% yield, vs BDX's 2.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BDX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -0.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs SOLV's 0.9%
- +51.8% vs BAX's -41.8%
Among these 5 stocks, COO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 124.3% 10Y total return vs BDX's 80.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41 vs BAX's 1.37, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs SOLV's 0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 13.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs BAX's -9.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs BAX's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, vs BDX's 2.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.8% vs BAX's -41.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs BAX's -5.4%, ROIC 16.9% vs -1.4% |
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COO leads in 1 of 6 categories
BAX leads 1 • BDX leads 1 • HOLX leads 1 • SOLV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.4B annually — 5.2x HOLX's $4.1B. SOLV is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAX's -9.7%. On growth, COO holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $11.3B | $21.4B | $4.2B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $671M | $4.2B | $1.0B | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | -$1.1B | $1.1B | $401M | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$203M | $501M | $3.1B | $333M | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +30.1% | +46.5% | +64.2% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | -2.7% | +10.6% | +17.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | -9.7% | +5.3% | +9.7% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +4.4% | +14.7% | +8.0% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +2.9% | -10.6% | +6.2% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.0% | -112.0% | -2.0% | +26.9% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SOLV trades at a 75% valuation discount to COO's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SOLV's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAX's 25.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $9.0B | $55.5B | $12.0B | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.6B | $17.1B | $73.9B | $14.6B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.07x | -10.01x | 26.29x | 32.68x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.07x | 9.17x | 12.27x | 13.24x | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.59x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.20x | 25.37x | 14.65x | 13.24x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 0.80x | 2.54x | 2.93x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.49x | 1.47x | 1.73x | 1.48x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.99x | 20.80x | 27.60x | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SOLV and HOLX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOLV delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-16 for BAX. COO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAX's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDX scores 7/9 vs COO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.7% | -16.5% | +4.5% | +4.8% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | -5.4% | +2.1% | +3.2% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | -1.4% | +4.3% | +4.8% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | -1.7% | +5.4% | +6.1% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 1.64x | 0.76x | 0.34x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $8.0B | $18.3B | $2.7B | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $878M | $2.0B | $851M | $111M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $10.0B | $19.2B | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.55x | -0.83x | 4.09x | 6.40x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BDX five years ago would be worth $11,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,566 for BAX. Over the past 12 months, BDX leads with a +51.8% total return vs BAX's -41.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BDX at 1.6% vs BAX's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.3% | -10.2% | +0.7% | -24.7% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.4% | -41.8% | +51.8% | -24.8% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.4% | -56.3% | +5.0% | -36.7% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.4% | -74.3% | +16.9% | -39.5% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.4% | -42.4% | +80.2% | +57.9% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.6% | -24.1% | +1.6% | -14.1% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAX's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BAX's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.37x | 0.66x | 0.93x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.20 | $32.68 | $205.52 | $89.83 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.38 | $15.73 | $100.31 | $60.00 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +53.6% | +74.6% | +68.0% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 44.0 | 32.2 | 24.7 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 8.7M | 2.5M | 2.0M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BAX and BDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOLV as "Buy", BAX as "Hold", BDX as "Buy", COO as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for COO (target: $94) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). For income investors, BAX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.87% vs BDX's 2.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.80 | $19.75 | $172.85 | $93.86 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 36 | 33 | 24 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.9% | +2.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $4.17 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +2.4% | +4.4% |
COO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SOLV vs BAX vs BDX vs COO vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 9% for Solventum Corporation (SOLV). Solventum Corporation (SOLV) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solventum Corporation (SOLV) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus The Cooper Companies, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, Baxter International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) delivered a total return of +16.
9%, compared to -74. 3% for Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOLX returned +124. 3% versus BAX's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Baxter International Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning BAX is approximately 234% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 164% for Baxter International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus 0. 9% for Solventum Corporation (SOLV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solventum Corporation grew EPS 221. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Baxter International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COO leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
7% net margin versus -8. 5% for Baxter International Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOLV leads at 26. 2% versus -2. 7% for BAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOLX leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baxter International Inc.
(BAX) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COO: 53. 6% to $93. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX?
In this comparison, BAX (3.
9% yield), BDX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SOLV, COO, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOLV or BAX or BDX or COO or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BDX: +80. 2%, SOLV: -10. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOLV and BAX and BDX and COO and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SOLV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; COO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BAX, BDX pay a dividend while SOLV, COO, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.