Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Consumer Electronics
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Computer Hardware
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $76M | $54M | $39M | $524M | $15.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $368M | $13M | $678M | $4.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-19M | $-1M | $48M | $711M |
| Gross Margin | 49.9% | 28.0% | 35.6% | 15.0% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | -1.6% | -17.3% | 9.2% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 59.7x | — | — | 16.5x | 19.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $33M | $3M | $4M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $32M | $3M | $39M | $1.75B |
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
| Universal Electroni… (UEIC) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 368.1 | +268.1% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 152.8 | +52.8% |
| Logitech Internatio… (LOGI) | 100 | 184.0 | +84.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOTK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.48 vs KOSS's 1.58
UEIC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, KOSS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IIIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- PEG 1.00 vs SOTK's 25.88
LOGI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs SOTK's 382.0%
- 14.7% margin vs KOSS's -8.6%
- +36.7% vs UEIC's -29.9%
- 18.5% ROA vs UEIC's -6.4%, ROIC 97.8% vs -0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs UEIC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 19.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.7% margin vs KOSS's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs KOSS's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs LOGI's 1.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs UEIC's -29.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs UEIC's -6.4%, ROIC 97.8% vs -0.0% |
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOGI leads in 3 of 6 categories
UEIC leads 1 • SOTK leads 0 • KOSS leads 0 • IIIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOGI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 377.0x KOSS's $13M. LOGI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOSS's -8.6%. On growth, IIIN holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $368M | $13M | $678M | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $9M | -$2M | $81M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$19M | -$1M | $48M | $711M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$811,225 | $17M | -$1M | $439,000 | $976M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.9% | +28.0% | +35.6% | +15.0% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -1.6% | -17.3% | +9.2% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -5.1% | -8.6% | +7.0% | +14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +4.7% | -11.2% | +0.1% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -20.6% | +1.6% | +23.3% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +76.3% | -77.5% | +6.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UEIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 78% valuation discount to SOTK's 59.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIIN offers better value at 0.78x vs SOTK's 25.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $54M | $39M | $524M | $15.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $55M | $39M | $489M | $13.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 59.65x | -3.05x | -44.54x | 12.84x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 16.50x | 19.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 25.88x | — | — | 0.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 41.23x | 3.93x | — | 6.72x | 17.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.69x | 0.15x | 3.12x | 0.81x | 3.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.27x | 0.39x | 1.27x | 1.42x | 7.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1346.90x | 2.75x | — | 27.64x | 16.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-13 for UEIC. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UEIC's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UEIC scores 6/9 vs LOGI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | -12.5% | -3.6% | +13.2% | +32.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | -6.4% | -3.0% | +10.4% | +18.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -0.0% | -4.2% | +14.1% | +97.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | -0.1% | -4.9% | +14.1% | +31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x | 0.08x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $1M | -$266,063 | -$35M | -$1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $32M | $3M | $39M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $33M | $3M | $4M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.08x | -3827.70x | 1192.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOTK five years ago would be worth $11,643 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $901 for UEIC. Over the past 12 months, LOGI leads with a +36.7% total return vs UEIC's -29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOGI at 20.7% vs UEIC's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | +18.5% | -4.1% | -16.7% | +9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.1% | -29.9% | -12.4% | -20.8% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.4% | -51.2% | +4.8% | +9.8% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.4% | -91.0% | -74.2% | -10.5% | +6.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.0% | -93.3% | +90.0% | +47.4% | +680.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.5% | -21.3% | +1.6% | +3.2% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SOTK and LOGI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOTK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOSS's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOGI currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs KOSS's 48.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.82x | 1.58x | 0.99x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.69 | $7.50 | $8.59 | $41.64 | $123.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.23 | $2.69 | $3.50 | $24.35 | $78.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +57.3% | +48.4% | +64.8% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 55.1 | 50.6 | 42.0 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 54K | 23K | 213K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IIIN and LOGI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IIIN as "Buy", LOGI as "Hold". For income investors, IIIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs LOGI's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $109.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 4 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.1% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.11 | $1.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
LOGI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UEIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SOTK vs UEIC vs KOSS vs IIIN vs LOGI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Sono-Tek Corporation at 59. 7x. On forward P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
Over the past 5 years, Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) delivered a total return of +16.
4%, compared to -91. 0% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOGI returned +680. 9% versus UEIC's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Koss Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning KOSS is approximately 226% more volatile than SOTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Universal Electronics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 6% for Sono-Tek Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOTK leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -6. 9% for Koss Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOGI leads at 16. 0% versus -13. 8% for KOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOTK leads at 47. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for Logitech International S. A. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI?
In this comparison, IIIN (4.
1% yield), LOGI (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SOTK, UEIC, KOSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOTK or UEIC or KOSS or IIIN or LOGI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), +382. 0% 10Y return). Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOTK: +382. 0%, KOSS: +90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOTK and UEIC and KOSS and IIIN and LOGI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOTK (Technology) and UEIC (Technology) and KOSS (Technology) and IIIN (Industrials) and LOGI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UEIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOGI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IIIN, LOGI pay a dividend while SOTK, UEIC, KOSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.