Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SPCE logo
SPCE
RKT logo
RKT
MNTS logo
MNTS
ASTS logo
ASTS
BA logo
BA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SPCE
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$273M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$35.72B
5Y Perf.-54.8%
MNTS
Momentus Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$66M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$27.96B
5Y Perf.+826.7%
BA
The Boeing Company

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$169.84B
5Y Perf.+25.4%

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SPCE logoSPCE
RKT logoRKT
MNTS logoMNTS
ASTS logoASTS
BA logoBA
IndustryAerospace & DefenseFinancial - MortgagesAerospace & DefenseCommunication EquipmentAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$273M$35.72B$66M$27.96B$169.84B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$6.88B$4M$85M$92.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-259M$239M$-34M$-487M$2.27B
Gross Margin-73.6%91.6%18.8%-27.0%4.8%
Operating Margin-198.7%8.7%-7.4%-440.5%-5.9%
Forward P/E17.2x86.9x
Total Debt$324M$0.00$11M$2.24B$54.43B
Cash & Equiv.$145M$2.70B$13M$2.34B$10.92B

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SPCE
RKT
MNTS
ASTS
BA
StockAug 20Jun 26Return
Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE)1001.2-98.8%
Rocket Companies, I… (RKT)10045.2-54.8%
Momentus Inc. (MNTS)1000.2-99.8%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100926.7+826.7%
The Boeing Company (BA)100125.4+25.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Rocket Companies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. MNTS and ASTS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇BA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SPCE
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SPCE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.91
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.91, current ratio 16.62x
  • Beta 1.91, current ratio 16.62x
  • Lower P/E (17.2x vs 86.9x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MNTS
Momentus Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MNTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +8.1% vs RKT's -1.2%
Best for: momentum
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Growth Play

ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
  • 8.6% 10Y total return vs BA's 82.3%
  • 15.1% revenue growth vs SPCE's -78.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BA
The Boeing Company
The Quality Compounder

BA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • 2.5% margin vs SPCE's -197.8%
  • Beta 1.05 vs MNTS's 3.69
  • 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 1.4% ROA vs MNTS's -117.5%, ROIC -9.5% vs -334.3%
Best for: quality and stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthASTS logoASTS15.1% revenue growth vs SPCE's -78.1%
ValueRKT logoRKTLower P/E (17.2x vs 86.9x)
Quality / MarginsBA logoBA2.5% margin vs SPCE's -197.8%
Stability / SafetyBA logoBABeta 1.05 vs MNTS's 3.69
DividendsBA logoBA0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MNTS logoMNTS+8.1% vs RKT's -1.2%
Efficiency (ROA)BA logoBA1.4% ROA vs MNTS's -117.5%, ROIC -9.5% vs -334.3%

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Space Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Space Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SPCEVirgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.
FY 2020
Technology Service
100.0%$200,000
Spaceflight Operations
0.0%$0
Sponsorship Revenue
0.0%$0
RKTRocket Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Direct To Customer Segment
87.8%$4.8B
Partner Network Segment
12.2%$668M
MNTSMomentus Inc.
FY 2023
Transportation Services
100.0%$2M
ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
BAThe Boeing Company
FY 2025
Commercial Airplanes Segment
100.0%$41.5B

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLASTSLAGGINGMNTS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 70369.5x SPCE's $1M. BA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPCE's -197.8%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$6.9B$4M$85M$92.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$244M$1.7B-$28M-$317M-$3.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$259M$239M-$34M-$487M$2.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$410M-$1.4B-$25M-$1.3B-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-73.6%+91.6%+18.8%-27.0%+4.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-198.7%+8.7%-7.4%-4.4%-5.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-197.8%-1.0%-8.4%-5.7%+2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-312.6%-58.4%-6.3%-15.3%-1.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-50.8%+9.0%+19.5%+14.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.0%+69.2%-2.3%+31.3%
Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — RKT and MNTS and BA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
Market CapShares × price$273M$35.7B$66M$28.0B$169.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$453M$33.0B$64M$27.9B$213.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.81x-460.00x-0.30x-69.85x86.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple37.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue176.96x5.19x59.10x394.30x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.82x1.37x0.54x10.02x30.10x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — RKT and MNTS and BA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MNTS. MNTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-105.0%+1.5%-4.0%-24.9%+2.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.4%+0.5%-117.5%-12.6%+1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-41.7%+2.0%-3.3%-16.8%-9.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.3%+1.6%-2.8%-10.0%-9.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.18x0.66x0.94x9.97x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$179M-$2.7B-$2M-$97M$43.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$145M$2.7B$13M$2.3B$10.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$324M$0$11M$2.2B$54.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-22.89x1.25x-22.41x-13.14x1.89x
Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $116,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +814.7% total return vs RKT's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 154.6% vs SPCE's -61.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+33.1%-36.4%+159.8%+12.1%-5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.9%-1.2%+814.7%+203.4%+3.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.2%+61.9%-93.9%+1550.8%+3.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%-27.3%-99.8%+1067.1%-14.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%-27.6%-99.8%+858.0%+82.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-61.4%+17.4%-60.6%+154.6%+1.1%
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BA is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs SPCE's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.28x1.91x3.69x3.22x1.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.90$24.36$22.20$133.68$254.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.13$12.38$0.44$27.72$176.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.2%+51.9%+67.2%+70.0%+84.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.241.766.255.345.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25.1M22.5M5.8M20.2M6.4M
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SPCE as "Hold", RKT as "Hold", ASTS as "Hold", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.0% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs -39.5% for SPCE (target: $3). BA is the only dividend payer here at 0.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSPCE logoSPCEVirgin Galactic H…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…MNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …BA logoBAThe Boeing Company
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.65$21.63$100.00$279.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts1725754
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ASTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). BA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.

Best OverallAST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 1% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE). The Boeing Company (BA) offers the better valuation at 86. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boeing Company (BA) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +1067%, compared to -99. 8% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +858. 0% versus MNTS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

05β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 69β — meaning MNTS is approximately 250% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -78. 1% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to -292. 3% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?

The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

5% net margin versus -180. 6% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -183. 4% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 71.

0% to $21. 63.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?

In this comparison, BA (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. SPCE, RKT, MNTS, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

05)). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +82. 3%, MNTS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SPCE and RKT and MNTS and ASTS and BA?

These companies operate in different sectors (SPCE (Industrials) and RKT (Financial Services) and MNTS (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and BA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.