Aerospace & Defense
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Aerospace & Defense
Communication Equipment
Aerospace & Defense
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Mortgages | Aerospace & Defense | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $273M | $35.72B | $66M | $27.96B | $169.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $6.88B | $4M | $85M | $92.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-259M | $239M | $-34M | $-487M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | -73.6% | 91.6% | 18.8% | -27.0% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -198.7% | 8.7% | -7.4% | -440.5% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x | — | — | 86.9x |
| Total Debt | $324M | $0.00 | $11M | $2.24B | $54.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $145M | $2.70B | $13M | $2.34B | $10.92B |
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 926.7 | +826.7% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SPCE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.91
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, current ratio 16.62x
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 16.62x
- Lower P/E (17.2x vs 86.9x)
MNTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.1% vs RKT's -1.2%
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs BA's 82.3%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPCE's -78.1%
BA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 2.5% margin vs SPCE's -197.8%
- Beta 1.05 vs MNTS's 3.69
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 1.4% ROA vs MNTS's -117.5%, ROIC -9.5% vs -334.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPCE's -78.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.2x vs 86.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs SPCE's -197.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs MNTS's 3.69 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.1% vs RKT's -1.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs MNTS's -117.5%, ROIC -9.5% vs -334.3% |
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASTS leads in 1 of 6 categories
BA leads 1 • SPCE leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • MNTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 70369.5x SPCE's $1M. BA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPCE's -197.8%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $6.9B | $4M | $85M | $92.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$244M | $1.7B | -$28M | -$317M | -$3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$259M | $239M | -$34M | -$487M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$410M | -$1.4B | -$25M | -$1.3B | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -73.6% | +91.6% | +18.8% | -27.0% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -198.7% | +8.7% | -7.4% | -4.4% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -197.8% | -1.0% | -8.4% | -5.7% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -312.6% | -58.4% | -6.3% | -15.3% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.8% | — | +9.0% | +19.5% | +14.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.0% | — | +69.2% | -2.3% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RKT and MNTS and BA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $273M | $35.7B | $66M | $28.0B | $169.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $453M | $33.0B | $64M | $27.9B | $213.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.81x | -460.00x | -0.30x | -69.85x | 86.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.20x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 37.11x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 176.96x | 5.19x | 59.10x | 394.30x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.37x | 0.54x | 10.02x | 30.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RKT and BA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MNTS. MNTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -105.0% | +1.5% | -4.0% | -24.9% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.4% | +0.5% | -117.5% | -12.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.7% | +2.0% | -3.3% | -16.8% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.3% | +1.6% | -2.8% | -10.0% | -9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | — | 0.66x | 0.94x | 9.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | -$2.7B | -$2M | -$97M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $145M | $2.7B | $13M | $2.3B | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $324M | $0 | $11M | $2.2B | $54.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.89x | 1.25x | -22.41x | -13.14x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $116,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +814.7% total return vs RKT's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 154.6% vs SPCE's -61.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.1% | -36.4% | +159.8% | +12.1% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | -1.2% | +814.7% | +203.4% | +3.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | +61.9% | -93.9% | +1550.8% | +3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -27.3% | -99.8% | +1067.1% | -14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -27.6% | -99.8% | +858.0% | +82.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.4% | +17.4% | -60.6% | +154.6% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BA is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs SPCE's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.91x | 3.69x | 3.22x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.90 | $24.36 | $22.20 | $133.68 | $254.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.13 | $12.38 | $0.44 | $27.72 | $176.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.2% | +51.9% | +67.2% | +70.0% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 41.7 | 66.2 | 55.3 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25.1M | 22.5M | 5.8M | 20.2M | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPCE as "Hold", RKT as "Hold", ASTS as "Hold", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.0% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs -39.5% for SPCE (target: $3). BA is the only dividend payer here at 0.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.65 | $21.63 | — | $100.00 | $279.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 25 | — | 7 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). BA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
SPCE vs RKT vs MNTS vs ASTS vs BA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 1% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE). The Boeing Company (BA) offers the better valuation at 86. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boeing Company (BA) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +1067%, compared to -99. 8% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +858. 0% versus MNTS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 69β — meaning MNTS is approximately 250% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -78. 1% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to -292. 3% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?
The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
5% net margin versus -180. 6% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -183. 4% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 71.
0% to $21. 63.
07Which pays a better dividend — SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA?
In this comparison, BA (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SPCE, RKT, MNTS, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SPCE or RKT or MNTS or ASTS or BA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05)). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +82. 3%, MNTS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SPCE and RKT and MNTS and ASTS and BA?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPCE (Industrials) and RKT (Financial Services) and MNTS (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and BA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.