Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Oil & Gas Midstream
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $12.50B | $17.64B | $2.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $842M | $6.05B | $17.02B | $3.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $4M | $-455M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | -10.4% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | -0.2% | 4.4% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 99.1x | 16.5x | 47.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $1.93B | $13.35B | $3.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.60B | $3.83B | $6M |
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suburban Propane Pa… (SPH) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| NGL Energy Partners… (NGL) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 0.55x
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 47.4x)
- 15.8% margin vs FLUT's -2.7%
- Beta 0.25 vs FLUT's 1.23
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
FLUT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 14.3%
- 78.8% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Beta 0.67, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.30x
- 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SPH's 6.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 47.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs FLUT's -2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs FLUT's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SPH's 6.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +417.0% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC 8.1% vs 4.5% |
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPH leads in 2 of 6 categories
NGL leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • FLUT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 20.2x SPH's $842M. SPH is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLUT's -2.7%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $842M | $6.1B | $17.0B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $284M | $266M | $2.0B | $672M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $4M | -$455M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $612M | $880M | $291M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +46.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -0.2% | +4.4% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +0.1% | -2.7% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +10.1% | +5.2% | +9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +42.8% | +17.4% | -41.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31792.8% | +192.9% | -22.3% | +4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLUT and NGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NGL's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $12.5B | $17.6B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $12.8B | $27.2B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.07x | -3113.58x | -58.47x | -26.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.54x | 99.14x | 16.51x | 47.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.43x | 49.42x | 10.69x | 8.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 2.06x | 1.08x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 19.81x | 1.87x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.37x | 19.31x | 16.35x | 38.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGL delivers a 132.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $133 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. FLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGL's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPH scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +0.5% | -4.3% | +132.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +0.1% | -1.6% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | -0.9% | +4.5% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | -0.6% | +4.6% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.22x | 3.06x | 1.38x | 4.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $330M | $9.5B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.6B | $3.8B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.9B | $13.3B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 1.92x | 0.04x | 2.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $72,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,935 for FLUT. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +417.0% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 80.6% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | -29.3% | -53.7% | +62.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | -27.3% | -58.3% | +417.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.5% | +4.3% | -49.0% | +488.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | -47.9% | -50.7% | +626.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +157.3% | -22.9% | +78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +1.4% | -20.1% | +80.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPH and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUT's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $48.78 | $313.69 | $16.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.30 | $20.46 | $97.94 | $2.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +51.7% | +32.2% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 55.1 | 35.0 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 12.9M | 3.4M | 238K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPH and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPH as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", NGL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs -87.6% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.34% vs SPH's 6.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $36.88 | $227.86 | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 48 | 24 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | — | — | +14.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | — | — | $2.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% | +6.4% | +0.1% |
SPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SPH vs DKNG vs FLUT vs NGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
On forward P/E, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +626.
6%, compared to -50. 7% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +157. 3% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 1. 23β — meaning FLUT is approximately 399% more volatile than SPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPH leads at 14. 4% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 88. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL?
In this comparison, NGL (14.
3% yield), SPH (6. 6% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG, FLUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPH or DKNG or FLUT or NGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), 6. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPH: +26. 2%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPH and DKNG and FLUT and NGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPH (Utilities) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical) and NGL (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SPH, NGL pay a dividend while DKNG, FLUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.