SPMC
Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc
Asset Management
Market Cap$220M
5Y Perf.-45.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SPMC vs OFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
Asset Management
Market Cap$52M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
SPMC vs OFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SPMC | OFS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $220M | $52M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $-12M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | 239.8% |
| Operating Margin | 98.6% | 280.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $218M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5K | $3M |
SPMC vs OFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SPMC
OFS
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Point Meridia… (SPMC) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| OFS Capital Corpora… (OFS) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPMC vs OFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SPMC and OFS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. OFS Capital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SPMC
Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc
The Banking Pick
SPMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 0.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.56x
- NIM 108.8% vs OFS's 6.7%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick
OFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 23.3% 10Y total return vs SPMC's -19.3%
- Beta 0.90, yield 30.4%, current ratio 0.74x
- Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | OFS | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | OFS | 280.2% margin vs SPMC's 98.6% |
| Stability / Safety | SPMC | Beta 0.32 vs OFS's 0.90 |
| Dividends | OFS | 30.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SPMC | -29.6% vs OFS's -42.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SPMC | 1.2% ROA vs OFS's -8.6% |
SPMC vs OFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSPMCLAGGINGOFS
OFSOFS Capital Corporati…
3leads
SPMCSound Point Meridian …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OFSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OFS3/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OFS2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SPMC6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SPMC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SPMC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
OFS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OFS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPMC and OFS operate at a comparable scale, with $65M and -$12M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.8% (OFS) to 98.6% (SPMC).
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | -$12M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | -$33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20.7B | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.8% | +2.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +98.6% | +2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +98.6% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -164.9% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -142.6% |
OFS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $220M | $52M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $267M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -1.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.41x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 749.55x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.20x |
OFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPMC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPMC delivers a 1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OFS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OFS scores 4/9 vs SPMC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | -23.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +216.2% | -8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4,992 | $214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4,992 | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $218M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 553.95x | -2.00x |
SPMC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OFS five years ago would be worth $10,661 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,075 for SPMC. Over the past 12 months, SPMC leads with a -29.6% total return vs OFS's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPMC at -6.9% vs OFS's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.6% | -42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +23.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.9% | -7.4% |
SPMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPMC currently trades 53.8% from its 52-week high vs OFS's 42.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.20 | $9.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.36 | $2.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.8% | +42.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 101K |
SPMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
OFS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
OFS is the only dividend payer here at 30.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SPMCSound Point Merid… | OFSOFS Capital Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | 0.0% | +30.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
OFS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
OFS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPMC leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallSound Point Meridian Capita… (SPMC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SPMC vs OFS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPMC or OFS a better buy right now?
Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) offers the better valuation at 0.
0x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SPMC or OFS?
Over the past 5 years, OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) delivered a total return of +6.
6%, compared to -19. 3% for Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OFS returned +23. 3% versus SPMC's -19. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SPMC or OFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc (SPMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus OFS Capital Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning OFS is approximately 180% more volatile than SPMC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — SPMC or OFS?
OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) is the more profitable company, earning 280.
2% net margin versus 98. 6% for Sound Point Meridian Capital Inc — meaning it keeps 280. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OFS leads at 280. 2% versus 98. 6% for SPMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFS leads at 239. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SPMC or OFS?
In this comparison, OFS (30.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SPMC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is SPMC or OFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 30. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OFS: +23. 3%, SPMC: -19. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SPMC and OFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPMC is a small-cap deep-value stock; OFS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. OFS pays a dividend while SPMC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Net Margin>
%
(SPMC: 98.6% · OFS: 280.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.