Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Software - Infrastructure
Biotechnology
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Software - Infrastructure | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $45M | $27M | $5.88B | $460M | $1.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $953M | $428M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-52M | $-464M | $56M | $-58M |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | — | — | 21.4% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | -117.2% | — | — | 14.8% | -8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 5.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $620K | $11M | $98K | $1.05B | $212M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $515K | $70M | $714M | $77M | $68M |
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordina… (SPPL) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
| Barinthus Biotherap… (BRNS) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 173.5 | +73.5% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 166.2 | +66.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPPL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BRNS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 11.16x
- +102.4% vs BRNS's -25.6%
PRTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 319.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- 5.8% margin vs SPPL's -104.2%
- 2.6% ROA vs SPPL's -51.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs -104.0%
ARDX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.05
- 253.1% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0%
- Beta 1.05 vs PRTH's 2.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs SPPL's -104.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs PRTH's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.4% vs BRNS's -25.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs SPPL's -51.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs -104.0% |
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARDX leads 1 • SPPL leads 0 • BRNS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $953M and $0 in trailing revenue. PRTH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPPL's -104.2%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $0 | $953M | $428M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$36M | -$487M | $204M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$52M | -$464M | $56M | -$58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$36M | -$423M | $75M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | — | — | +21.4% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -117.2% | — | — | +14.8% | -8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -104.2% | — | — | +5.8% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -68.1% | — | — | +7.9% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.8% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +71.4% | +19.7% | +3.1% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRNS and PRTH and ARDX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $27M | $5.9B | $460M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | -$32M | $5.2B | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.49x | -0.41x | -10.60x | 8.26x | -26.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 5.89x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.99x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.17x | — | — | 0.48x | 4.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.40x | 0.37x | 6.20x | — | 9.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 6.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARDX delivers a -38.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-131 for SPPL. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPPL scores 6/9 vs BRNS's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -63.8% | -47.1% | — | -38.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.1% | -48.8% | -44.1% | +2.6% | -11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.0% | -174.5% | — | +13.4% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -133.5% | -46.6% | -66.1% | +16.0% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.15x | 0.00x | — | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $104,791 | -$59M | -$714M | $969M | $144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $514,825 | $70M | $714M | $77M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $619,616 | $11M | $98,000 | $1.0B | $212M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -126.91x | -1808.55x | — | 1.51x | -0.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $494 for BRNS. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +102.4% total return vs BRNS's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARDX at 17.4% vs SPPL's -58.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.6% | -8.8% | +11.7% | +5.6% | +10.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.4% | -25.6% | +102.4% | -16.2% | +86.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -71.4% | +49.8% | +53.6% | +61.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -95.1% | +84.4% | -13.5% | +313.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -95.2% | +190.9% | -42.7% | +253.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.8% | -34.1% | +14.4% | +15.4% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPPL and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPPL is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs BRNS's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.50x | 1.36x | 2.00x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $2.92 | $30.09 | $8.89 | $8.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $0.51 | $13.36 | $4.44 | $3.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.1% | +22.9% | +96.2% | +63.2% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.6 | 61.0 | 50.6 | 60.9 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 585K | 24K | 1.4M | 252K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 150.7% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 57.2% for IMVT (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $45.50 | $12.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 23 | 5 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARDX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SPPL vs BRNS vs IMVT vs PRTH vs ARDX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 4%, compared to -95. 1% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARDX returned +253. 1% versus BRNS's -95. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIMPPLE Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SPPL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning PRTH is approximately -9032% more volatile than SPPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX?
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -104. 2% for SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -117. 2% for SPPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 150.
7% to $17. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SPPL or BRNS or IMVT or PRTH or ARDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIMPPLE Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SPPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPPL: -93. 0%, PRTH: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SPPL and BRNS and IMVT and PRTH and ARDX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPPL (Technology) and BRNS (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and PRTH (Technology) and ARDX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.