Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Construction
Banks - Regional
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Construction | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $10.29B | $15.65B | $4.41B | $10.58B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $4.33B | $2.18B | $1.62B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $254M | $189M | $150M | $118M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 38.1% | 35.2% | 26.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 7.5% | 12.6% | 10.4% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 30.9x | 21.8x | 65.3x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $1.33B | $280M | $433M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $341M | $100M | $13K | $668M |
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPX Technologies, I… (SPXC) | 100 | 513.0 | +413.0% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPXC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 17.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 11.8% 10Y total return vs AAON's 6.1%
- PEG 1.37 vs AAON's 12.01
GNRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +129.9% vs FELE's +17.7%
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92 vs AAON's 1.83, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, AAON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 65.3x), PEG 1.42 vs 12.01
- 20.0% margin vs GNRC's 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 65.3x), PEG 1.42 vs 12.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs GNRC's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs AAON's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs TRMK's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs FELE's +17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 7.1% |
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 2 of 6 categories
FELE leads 1 • SPXC leads 1 • GNRC leads 0 • AAON leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 3.9x TRMK's $1.1B. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNRC's 4.4%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $4.3B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $492M | $472M | $322M | $228M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $254M | $189M | $150M | $118M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | $419M | $169M | -$145M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +38.1% | +35.2% | +26.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +7.5% | +12.6% | +10.4% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +4.4% | +6.9% | +7.3% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +9.7% | +7.8% | -9.0% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +12.4% | +9.9% | +54.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +69.9% | +13.4% | +37.1% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 88% valuation discount to AAON's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs AAON's 18.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.3B | $15.7B | $4.4B | $10.6B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.4B | $16.6B | $4.6B | $11.0B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.53x | 99.17x | 30.75x | 100.19x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.12x | 30.91x | 21.77x | 65.28x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.13x | — | 3.53x | 18.43x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.70x | 34.39x | 13.82x | 48.81x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.54x | 3.72x | 2.07x | 7.34x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.45x | 5.99x | 3.41x | 12.00x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.66x | 58.38x | 22.81x | — | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAON delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for GNRC. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs AAON's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +7.2% | +11.4% | +13.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +3.4% | +7.6% | +7.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +5.9% | +14.7% | +9.4% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +6.9% | +18.1% | +12.4% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.51x | 0.21x | 0.48x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | $992M | $181M | $433M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $341M | $100M | $13,000 | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $1.3B | $280M | $433M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.50x | 4.54x | 24.75x | 11.27x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPXC five years ago would be worth $32,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs FELE's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPXC at 41.9% vs FELE's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +89.1% | +3.6% | +63.3% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.2% | +129.9% | +17.7% | +35.5% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.4% | +141.5% | +10.0% | +101.6% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +222.6% | -18.5% | +20.3% | +196.3% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1183.4% | +666.1% | +231.4% | +612.1% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.9% | +34.2% | +3.2% | +26.3% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAON's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs SPXC's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.69x | 0.92x | 1.83x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $246.68 | $269.58 | $111.53 | $148.88 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.39 | $113.96 | $83.42 | $62.00 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +99.0% | +89.6% | +86.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 77.8 | 54.8 | 59.4 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 895K | 281K | 965K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPXC as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", FELE as "Hold", AAON as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for SPXC (target: $247) vs -7.9% for AAON (target: $119). For income investors, TRMK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.15% vs AAON's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $247.00 | $271.22 | $100.00 | $119.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 39 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 32 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $1.11 | $0.39 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +3.8% | +0.3% | +3.0% |
TRMK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FELE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE vs AAON vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus AAON, Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPX Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 37x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) delivered a total return of +222. 6%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1183% versus TRMK's +127. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus AAON, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning AAON is approximately 99% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAON leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 37x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 53. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPXC: 20. 4% to $247. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK?
In this comparison, TRMK (2.
2% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield), AAON (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SPXC, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE or AAON or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 1% yield, +231. 4% 10Y return). AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +231. 4%, AAON: +612. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPXC and GNRC and FELE and AAON and TRMK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPXC (Industrials) and GNRC (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and AAON (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPXC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. FELE, TRMK pay a dividend while SPXC, GNRC, AAON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.