Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.18B | $9.91B | $4.39B | $12.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $2.56B | $2.18B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $254M | $366M | $150M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 49.2% | 35.2% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 19.4% | 12.6% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 24.9x | 21.6x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $198M | $280M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $406M | $100M | $102M |
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPX Technologies, I… (SPXC) | 100 | 507.4 | +407.4% |
| Watts Water Technol… (WTS) | 100 | 357.0 | +257.0% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 195.9 | +95.9% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPXC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 17.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs WTS's 457.2%
- 14.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- +35.8% vs PNR's -16.8%
WTS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.01 vs FELE's 2.48
- 13.1% ROA vs SPXC's 7.1%, ROIC 21.2% vs 13.4%
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89 vs SPXC's 1.31, lower leverage
PNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48
- 16.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9%
- 1.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs FELE's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs SPXC's 1.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.8% vs PNR's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SPXC's 7.1%, ROIC 21.2% vs 13.4% |
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNR leads in 1 of 6 categories
WTS leads 1 • SPXC leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WTS and PNR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 1.9x FELE's $2.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, WTS holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $2.6B | $2.2B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $492M | $553M | $322M | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $254M | $366M | $150M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | $317M | $169M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +49.2% | +35.2% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +19.4% | +12.6% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +14.3% | +6.9% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +12.4% | +7.8% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +21.4% | +9.9% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +34.4% | +13.4% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 52% valuation discount to SPXC's 40.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTS offers better value at 1.18x vs FELE's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $9.9B | $4.4B | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $9.7B | $4.6B | $14.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.09x | 29.19x | 30.57x | 19.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.31x | 24.95x | 21.64x | 14.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | 1.18x | 3.51x | 1.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.47x | 18.36x | 13.74x | 14.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.49x | 4.07x | 2.06x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.40x | 4.91x | 3.39x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.20x | 27.83x | 22.67x | 16.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $11 for FELE. WTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNR's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +18.4% | +11.4% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +13.1% | +7.6% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +21.2% | +14.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +21.7% | +18.1% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.10x | 0.21x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | -$208M | $181M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $406M | $100M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $198M | $280M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.50x | 46.73x | 24.75x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPXC five years ago would be worth $31,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,789 for PNR. Over the past 12 months, SPXC leads with a +35.8% total return vs PNR's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPXC at 41.3% vs FELE's 3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +6.8% | +3.0% | -26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +27.2% | +14.9% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.3% | +77.6% | +9.4% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.0% | +119.0% | +21.6% | +17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1169.3% | +457.2% | +229.5% | +121.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.3% | +21.1% | +3.0% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPXC's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.92x | 0.89x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $246.68 | $345.17 | $111.53 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.39 | $221.04 | $83.42 | $76.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +86.0% | +89.1% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 45.8 | 51.4 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 212K | 275K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPXC as "Buy", WTS as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 0.7% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, PNR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.29% vs WTS's 0.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.00 | $343.10 | $100.00 | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 11 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 32 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $1.11 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
PNR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). WTS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SPXC vs WTS vs FELE vs PNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
4x versus SPX Technologies, Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Watts Water Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) delivered a total return of +219. 0%, compared to +17. 9% for Pentair plc (PNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1169% versus PNR's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus SPX Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning SPXC is approximately 48% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 42% for Pentair plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPXC leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 6. 9% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTS leads at 49. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for SPX Technologies, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 47. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR?
In this comparison, PNR (1.
3% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield), WTS (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SPXC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPXC or WTS or FELE or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
(WTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 0. 7% yield, +457. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTS: +457. 2%, PNR: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPXC and WTS and FELE and PNR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WTS, FELE, PNR pay a dividend while SPXC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.