REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Residential
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $44M | $354M | $616M | $756M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $76M | $166M | $252M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-10M | $21M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 87.4% | -11.7% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 78.6% | 27.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 83.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $102M | $0.00 | $856M | $1.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $27M | $11M | $14M |
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SQFT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +11.2% vs SQFT's -40.7%
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs GOOD's 51.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SQFT's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.2% vs SQFT's -40.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.2% |
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOD leads in 4 of 6 categories
LAND leads 1 • SQFT leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 14.4x SQFT's $18M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $76M | $166M | $252M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $94M | $106M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$10M | $21M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67,454 | $5M | $90M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +87.4% | -11.7% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +78.6% | +27.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | -13.8% | +12.7% | -12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +6.2% | +54.1% | +31.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +38.6% | +11.8% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -188.7% | +66.7% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LAND's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 26.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $354M | $616M | $756M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $327M | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.56x | -33.62x | 31.02x | -23.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 82.97x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.78x | 3.46x | 12.36x | 18.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 4.65x | 3.82x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 0.53x | 1.76x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.62x | 9.17x | 9.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. GOOD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SQFT scores 4/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.1% | -1.6% | +9.7% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -0.8% | +1.7% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +4.9% | +4.4% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +4.7% | +5.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.92x | — | 2.50x | 5.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $94M | -$27M | $846M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $27M | $11M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $0 | $856M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 2.99x | 1.46x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,870 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, LAND leads with a +11.2% total return vs SQFT's -40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs SQFT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +8.8% | +21.6% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.7% | +11.2% | +0.7% | -15.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | -27.5% | +43.8% | -15.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -43.8% | -9.7% | -23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +42.9% | +51.0% | +211.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | -10.2% | +12.9% | -5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SQFT's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.68x | 0.55x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.00 | $13.00 | $15.03 | $38.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $8.47 | $10.33 | $23.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +75.0% | +84.6% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 41.0 | 49.1 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 543K | 390K | 216K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAND as "Buy", GOOD as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.6% upside for LAND (target: $10) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs SQFT's 5.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $13.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 14 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +6.7% | +11.4% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $0.66 | $1.44 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +1.0% |
GOOD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAND leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SQFT vs LAND vs GOOD vs NXRT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (83. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -71. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus SQFT's -74. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Presidio Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning SQFT is approximately 57% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOD leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAND: 2.
6% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 5. 1% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT).
08Is SQFT or LAND or GOOD or NXRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, SQFT: -74. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SQFT and LAND and GOOD and NXRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.