REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $44M | $756M | $616M | $354M | $170M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $252M | $166M | $76M | $145M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-32M | $21M | $-10M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 91.1% | -11.7% | 87.4% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 11.5% | 27.9% | 78.6% | 54.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 83.0x | — | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $1.56B | $856M | $0.00 | $672M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $14M | $11M | $27M | $48M |
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 28.2 | -71.8% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 64.5 | -35.5% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SQFT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NXRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs GOOD's 51.0%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.4%
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- 12.7% margin vs SQFT's -38.7%
- Beta 0.55 vs SQFT's 0.87, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, LAND doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
STRW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 46.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- Better valuation composite
- +29.7% vs SQFT's -40.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SQFT's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.7% vs SQFT's -40.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.2% |
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories
SQFT leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • GOOD leads 0 • LAND leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOOD and LAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 14.4x SQFT's $18M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $252M | $166M | $76M | $145M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $125M | $106M | $94M | $123M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$32M | $21M | -$10M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67,454 | $79M | $90M | $5M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +91.1% | -11.7% | +87.4% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +11.5% | +27.9% | +78.6% | +54.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | -12.7% | +12.7% | -13.8% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +31.2% | +54.1% | +6.2% | +60.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +0.5% | +11.8% | +38.6% | +34.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -188.7% | 0.0% | +2.8% | +66.7% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LAND and STRW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 27% valuation discount to GOOD's 31.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LAND's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 26.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $756M | $616M | $354M | $170M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $2.3B | $1.5B | $327M | $793M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.56x | -23.65x | 31.02x | -33.62x | 22.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 82.97x | — | 19.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.78x | 18.60x | 12.36x | 3.46x | 8.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 3.01x | 3.82x | 4.65x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 2.52x | 1.76x | 0.53x | 1.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.05x | 9.17x | 50.62x | 4.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. GOOD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.1% | -10.1% | +9.7% | -1.6% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -1.7% | +1.7% | -0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +1.1% | +4.4% | +4.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +1.5% | +5.3% | +4.7% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.92x | 5.18x | 2.50x | — | 8.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $94M | $1.5B | $846M | -$27M | $623M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $14M | $11M | $27M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $1.6B | $856M | $0 | $672M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 0.47x | 1.46x | 2.99x | 1.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,870 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, STRW leads with a +29.7% total return vs SQFT's -40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRW at 27.9% vs SQFT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +2.6% | +21.6% | +8.8% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.7% | -15.2% | +0.7% | +11.2% | +29.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | -15.5% | +43.8% | -27.5% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -23.0% | -9.7% | -43.8% | +47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +211.1% | +51.0% | +42.9% | +47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | -5.5% | +12.9% | -10.2% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOD and STRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SQFT's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRW currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.62x | 0.55x | 0.68x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.00 | $38.30 | $15.03 | $13.00 | $14.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $23.79 | $10.33 | $8.47 | $9.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +77.8% | +84.6% | +75.0% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 71.0 | 49.1 | 41.0 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 216K | 390K | 543K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", GOOD as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", STRW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs STRW's 4.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $13.00 | $10.00 | $15.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | 11 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +7.1% | +11.4% | +6.7% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $2.11 | $1.44 | $0.66 | $0.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
SQFT vs NXRT vs GOOD vs LAND vs STRW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation at 31. 0x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to -71. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus SQFT's -74. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Presidio Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning SQFT is approximately 57% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRW leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 63. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 4. 4% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW).
09Is SQFT or NXRT or GOOD or LAND or STRW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, SQFT: -74. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SQFT and NXRT and GOOD and LAND and STRW?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.