SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$13.08B
5Y Perf.+275.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SQM vs MOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MOS
The Mosaic Company
Agricultural Inputs
Market Cap$7.27B
5Y Perf.+83.5%
SQM vs MOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SQM | MOS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $13.08B | $7.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $11.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $524M | $1.22B |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 21.1% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $4.82B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.38B | $277M |
SQM vs MOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SQM
MOS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sociedad Química y … (SQM) | 100 | 375.0 | +275.0% |
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SQM vs MOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MOS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder
SQM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 464.6% 10Y total return vs MOS's 14.9%
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 15.9x)
- 12.1% margin vs MOS's 10.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
MOS
The Mosaic Company
The Income Pick
MOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 4.2%
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MOS | 5.0% revenue growth vs SQM's -39.4% |
| Value | SQM | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 15.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SQM | 12.1% margin vs MOS's 10.5% |
| Stability / Safety | MOS | Beta 0.52 vs SQM's 1.24, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MOS | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SQM's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SQM | +173.2% vs MOS's -24.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MOS | 5.0% ROA vs SQM's 4.5%, ROIC 6.1% vs 9.0% |
SQM vs MOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
SQM vs MOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMOSLAGGINGSQM
SQMSociedad Química y Mi…
2leads
MOSThe Mosaic Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SQMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SQM6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MOS3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MOS7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SQM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MOS2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 2.7x SQM's $4.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.1% (SQM) to 10.5% (MOS). On growth, SQM holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $917M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $524M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | -$535M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | -7.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.8% | +3.8% |
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MOS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQM's 15.4x.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.1B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.5B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.51x | 5.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.60x | 15.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.43x | 3.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.02x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.19x | — |
MOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for SQM. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQM's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOS scores 7/9 vs SQM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $277M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.37x | 8.81x |
MOS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SQM five years ago would be worth $19,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,211 for MOS. Over the past 12 months, SQM leads with a +173.2% total return vs MOS's -24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQM at 12.0% vs MOS's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.4% | -7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.2% | -24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.7% | -32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.2% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +464.6% | +14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | -12.4% |
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SQM and MOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SQM's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SQM currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs MOS's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.00 | $38.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.36 | $22.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +59.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 9.5M |
Evenly matched — SQM and MOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SQM as "Hold" and MOS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.4% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs -14.9% for SQM (target: $78). For income investors, MOS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.15% vs SQM's 0.26%.
| Metric | SQMSociedad Química … | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $31.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SQM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallThe Mosaic Company (MOS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SQM vs MOS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SQM or MOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 4% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SQM or MOS?
On forward P/E, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SQM or MOS?
Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +94. 2%, compared to -27. 9% for The Mosaic Company (MOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +468. 7% versus MOS's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SQM or MOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning SQM is approximately 145% more volatile than MOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 93% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SQM or MOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -39. 4% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SQM leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SQM or MOS?
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -8. 9% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 9. 9% for MOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SQM or MOS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for The Mosaic Company — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 36. 4% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SQM or MOS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 3% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. (SQM).
09Is SQM or MOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOS: +12. 0%, SQM: +468. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SQM and MOS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SQM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOS pays a dividend while SQM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SQM: 8.9% · MOS: -7.5%)Net Margin>
%
(SQM: 12.1% · MOS: 10.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.