Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $4.04B | $17.64B | $12.50B | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $17.02B | $6.05B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $-455M | $4M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 44.2% | 41.3% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 4.4% | -0.2% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 33.1x | 16.5x | 99.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $63M | $13.35B | $1.93B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $365M | $3.83B | $1.60B | $887M |
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 1.17x
- 5.2% margin vs CZR's -4.2%
- Beta 0.65 vs CZR's 1.27, lower leverage
FLUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
- Better valuation composite
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs CZR's 302.6%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
CZR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +2.5% vs FLUT's -58.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CZR's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.5% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC 12.9% vs 4.5% |
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CZR leads in 1 of 6 categories
SRAD leads 1 • FLUT leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SRAD and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 12.8x SRAD's $1.3B. SRAD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $17.0B | $6.1B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $308M | $2.0B | $266M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | -$455M | $4M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $363M | $880M | $612M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +44.2% | +41.3% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +4.4% | -0.2% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -2.7% | +0.1% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +5.2% | +10.1% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +17.4% | +42.8% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.5% | -22.3% | +192.9% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $17.6B | $12.5B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $27.2B | $12.8B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.69x | -58.47x | -3113.58x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.09x | 16.51x | 99.14x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.74x | 10.69x | 49.42x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 1.08x | 2.06x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.79x | 1.87x | 19.81x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.98x | 16.35x | 19.31x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SRAD delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. SRAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -4.3% | +0.5% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -1.6% | +0.1% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.9% | +4.5% | -0.9% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +4.6% | -0.6% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.38x | 3.06x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$302M | $9.5B | $330M | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $365M | $3.8B | $1.6B | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $13.3B | $1.9B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 0.04x | 1.92x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SRAD and CZR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth $5,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,627 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, CZR leads with a +2.5% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SRAD at 1.9% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.5% | -53.7% | -29.3% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.4% | -58.3% | -27.3% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.7% | -49.0% | +4.3% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -50.7% | -47.9% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -22.9% | +157.3% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | -20.1% | +1.4% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRAD and CZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZR currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.23x | 1.12x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.22 | $313.69 | $48.78 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.66 | $97.94 | $20.46 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.3% | +32.2% | +51.7% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 35.0 | 55.1 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 3.4M | 12.9M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
FLUT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRAD as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 10.0% for CZR (target: $31).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.75 | $227.86 | $36.88 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 24 | 48 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +6.4% | +6.6% | +4.0% |
CZR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SRAD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SRAD vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) delivered a total return of -45.
5%, compared to -73. 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus SRAD's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Caesars Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning CZR is approximately 94% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SRAD or FLUT or DKNG or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -45. 5%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRAD and FLUT and DKNG and CZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SRAD (Technology) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.