SREA vs SO

For growth investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger pick with 10.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 9% for Sempra (SREA). Sempra (SREA) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Southern Company (SO) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sempra (SREA) is the cheapest at 7.

8x versus The Southern Company at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, Sempra is actually cheaper at 4. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, The Southern Company (SO) delivered a total return of +62.

8%, compared to +5. 6% for Sempra (SREA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +141. 5% versus SREA's +24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Sempra's 0. 83β — meaning SREA is approximately -645% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sempra (SREA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 169% for The Southern Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company (SO) is pulling ahead at 10.

6% versus 3. 9% for Sempra (SREA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Southern Company grew EPS -1. 8% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Sempra. Over a 3-year CAGR, SO leads at 0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Southern Company (SO) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

7% net margin versus 13. 4% for Sempra — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SO leads at 24. 6% versus 23. 7% for SREA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SO leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Sempra (SREA) trades at 4.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for The Southern Company — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sempra (SREA) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 2. 9% for The Southern Company (SO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 9% yield, +141. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +141. 5%, SREA: +24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SREA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.