SRFM vs BA

For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM). The Boeing Company (BA) offers the better valuation at 92. 7x trailing P/E (4955. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boeing Company (BA) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, The Boeing Company (BA) delivered a total return of +0.

1%, compared to -93. 8% for Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BA returned +92. 1% versus SRFM's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

97β versus Surf Air Mobility Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning SRFM is approximately 270% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.

5% versus -10. 8% for Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 8% for Surf Air Mobility Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SRFM leads at 73. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

5% net margin versus -103. 8% for Surf Air Mobility Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BA leads at -6. 1% versus -72. 1% for SRFM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BA leads at 4. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BA: 14.

7% to $263. 67.

In this comparison, BA (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. SRFM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

97)). Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) carries a higher beta of 3. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +92. 1%, SRFM: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SRFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.