REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $151M | $9.23B | $15.87B | $1.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $1.39B | $2.16B | $578M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $444M | $616M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 78.5% | 54.7% | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | -205.1% | 37.4% | 36.1% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.7x | 30.5x | 47.7x |
| Total Debt | $240M | $5.87B | $8.64B | $2.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $362M | $213M | $42M |
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seritage Growth Pro… (SRG) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Brixmor Property Gr… (BRX) | 100 | 132.3 | +32.3% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 105.0 | +5.0% |
| CBL & Associates Pr… (CBL) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (29.7x vs 47.7x)
- 32.0% margin vs SRG's -404.4%
KIM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CBL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth 132.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.9%
- 78.3% 10Y total return vs BRX's 51.0%
- Beta 0.68, yield 5.7%, current ratio 2.55x
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs SRG's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs SRG's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 47.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.0% margin vs SRG's -404.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs SRG's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CBL's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.2% vs SRG's -7.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs SRG's -12.1%, ROIC 4.2% vs -5.1% |
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BRX leads in 1 of 6 categories
CBL leads 1 • SRG leads 0 • KIM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 117.4x SRG's $18M. BRX is the more profitable business, keeping 32.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRG's -4.0%. On growth, SRG holds the edge at +47.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $1.4B | $2.2B | $578M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $937M | $1.4B | $305M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | $444M | $616M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | $663M | $844M | $255M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +78.5% | +54.7% | +7.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +37.4% | +36.1% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +32.0% | +28.5% | +23.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +47.7% | +39.0% | +44.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.2% | +5.1% | +4.0% | +18.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.5% | +78.3% | +27.8% | +27.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SRG and BRX and CBL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, CBL trades at a 64% valuation discount to KIM's 28.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBL's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 17.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $151M | $9.2B | $15.9B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $306M | $14.7B | $24.3B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 24.07x | 28.35x | 10.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.75x | 30.48x | 47.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.05x | 17.70x | 11.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.57x | 6.73x | 7.41x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 3.08x | 1.50x | 3.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.16x | 20.54x | 18.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SRG and BRX and CBL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBL delivers a 42.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SRG. SRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBL's 5.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBL scores 7/9 vs SRG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.1% | +14.9% | +5.8% | +42.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | +5.0% | +3.1% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +4.6% | +3.0% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | +6.2% | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.95x | 0.82x | 5.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155M | $5.5B | $8.4B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $362M | $213M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240M | $5.9B | $8.6B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.83x | 2.72x | 2.46x | 1.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBL five years ago would be worth $17,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,606 for SRG. Over the past 12 months, CBL leads with a +88.2% total return vs SRG's -7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBL at 30.7% vs SRG's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +18.3% | +18.6% | +20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | +23.8% | +18.9% | +88.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | +58.0% | +43.6% | +123.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | +55.8% | +31.1% | +78.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | +51.0% | +11.1% | +78.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.4% | +16.5% | +12.8% | +30.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRX and KIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRG's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KIM currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs SRG's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.46x | 0.54x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.56 | $31.49 | $24.31 | $45.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.43 | $24.38 | $19.76 | $23.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +95.6% | +96.8% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 55.6 | 58.4 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 2.5M | 5.0M | 171K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BRX and CBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRG as "Hold", BRX as "Buy", KIM as "Hold", CBL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for KIM (target: $24) vs 3.0% for BRX (target: $31). For income investors, CBL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.69% vs SRG's 3.25%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.00 | $24.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 30 | 36 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +3.8% | +4.5% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.15 | $1.06 | $2.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.0% | +0.8% | +1.3% |
BRX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CBL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
SRG vs BRX vs KIM vs CBL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (47. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
On trailing P/E, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Kimco Realty Corporation at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Brixmor Property Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
Over the past 5 years, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) delivered a total return of +78. 3%, compared to -83. 9% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBL returned +78. 3% versus SRG's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Seritage Growth Properties's 1. 01β — meaning SRG is approximately 120% more volatile than BRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 6% for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. grew EPS 132. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Seritage Growth Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -871. 3% for Seritage Growth Properties — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRX leads at 36. 7% versus -259. 9% for SRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRX leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 47. 7x for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KIM: 3. 1% to $24. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 3. 3% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG).
09Is SRG or BRX or KIM or CBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRX: +51. 0%, SRG: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRG and BRX and KIM and CBL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CBL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.