Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Distribution
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1M | $111.40B | $6.63B | $92.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $407.90B | $2.35B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $2.93B | $128M | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 13.9% | 69.7% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 1.5% | 4.6% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.2x | 51.5x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $93.59B | $1.12B | $7.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $8.51B | $229M | $5.69B |
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRx Health Solution… (SRXH) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| CVS Health Corporat… (CVS) | 100 | 130.9 | +30.9% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 77.5 | -22.5% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRXH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CVS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 0.84x
- Lower P/E (12.2x vs 19.3x)
- 3.1% yield, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +34.7% vs SRXH's -84.6%
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs CVS's 7.8%
- 5.5% margin vs SRXH's -9.4%
- 6.0% ROA vs SRXH's -22.4%, ROIC 10.7% vs -18.1%
MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 0.4%
- 348.1% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Beta 0.04, yield 0.4%, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 0.04 vs HIMS's 2.40
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs CVS's 7.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs SRXH's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs SRXH's -84.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs SRXH's -22.4%, ROIC 10.7% vs -18.1% |
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 1 of 6 categories
MCK leads 1 • SRXH leads 0 • CVS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVS is the larger business by revenue, generating $407.9B annually — 3429.5x SRXH's $119M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRXH's -9.4%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $407.9B | $2.3B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $10.5B | $164M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.9B | $128M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $7.4B | $73M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +13.9% | +69.7% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | +0.7% | +5.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +1.8% | +3.1% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.2% | +28.4% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +63.1% | -27.3% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SRXH and CVS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.2x trailing earnings, MCK trades at a 53% valuation discount to CVS's 62.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CVS's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $111.4B | $6.6B | $92.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $196.5B | $7.5B | $93.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 62.81x | 50.32x | 29.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.19x | 51.51x | 19.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.11x | 42.68x | 18.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.28x | 2.82x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.47x | 12.25x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | 14.27x | 89.61x | 17.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $4 for CVS. CVS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCK scores 6/9 vs SRXH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.9% | +23.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.4% | +1.1% | +6.0% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.1% | +5.0% | +10.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.8% | +6.1% | +10.9% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.24x | 2.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37M | $85.1B | $892M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $8.5B | $229M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $93.6B | $1.1B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.83x | 2.11x | — | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CVS and HIMS and MCK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $536 for SRXH. Over the past 12 months, CVS leads with a +34.7% total return vs SRXH's -84.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs SRXH's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | +10.6% | -23.2% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.6% | +34.7% | -51.0% | +4.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +36.6% | +116.6% | +106.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +17.0% | +137.6% | +286.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +3.5% | +161.9% | +348.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.3% | +11.0% | +29.4% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRXH and CVS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRXH is the less volatile stock with a -0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SRXH's 9.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.32x | 0.05x | 2.40x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $88.63 | $70.43 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $58.35 | $13.74 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.0% | +98.5% | +36.4% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 69.3 | 54.5 | 16.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.0M | 7.4M | 34.9M | 757K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVS and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVS as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.8% upside for MCK (target: $1007) vs 9.0% for CVS (target: $95). For income investors, CVS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs MCK's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.20 | $29.67 | $1006.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 | 19 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.67 | — | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.4% |
HIMS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MCK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
SRXH vs CVS vs HIMS vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 8% for CVS Health Corporation (CVS). McKesson Corporation (MCK) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVS Health Corporation (CVS) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
On trailing P/E, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the cheapest at 29.
2x versus CVS Health Corporation at 62. 8x. On forward P/E, CVS Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.
9%, compared to -94. 6% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. (SRXH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +348. 1% versus SRXH's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 32β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately -844% more volatile than SRXH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 7. 8% for CVS Health Corporation (CVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SRx Health Solutions Inc. grew EPS 74. 1% year-over-year, compared to -62. 0% for CVS Health Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -9. 4% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -4. 9% for SRXH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) trades at 12.
2x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCK: 33. 8% to $1006. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK?
In this comparison, CVS (3.
1% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SRXH, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SRXH or CVS or HIMS or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), 3. 1% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVS: +3. 5%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRXH and CVS and HIMS and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRXH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CVS pays a dividend while SRXH, HIMS, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.