Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $16.61B | $17.45B | $22.48B | $29.67B | $4.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.41B | $7.32B | $11.66B | $21.09B | $2.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $810M | $1.10B | $2.67B | $3.20B | $310M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 31.3% | 37.6% | 60.8% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 17.1% | 17.0% | 24.4% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 15.7x | 6.9x | 6.8x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $7.65B | $3.46B | $4.01B | $29.12B | $4.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.57B | $562M | $599M | $798M | $906M |
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SS&C Technologies H… (SSNC) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Broadridge Financia… (BR) | 100 | 123.5 | +23.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.07x
- 6.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2%
BR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs SSNC's 160.4%
- Beta 0.19, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.98x
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 22.9% margin vs WEX's 11.5%
- 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BR's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs SSNC's 1.65
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 7.3x)
WEX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +11.8% vs FISV's -69.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs WEX's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs WEX's 1.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BR's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.8% vs FISV's -69.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs WEX's 2.1%, ROIC 16.2% vs 9.6% |
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • BR leads 1 • SSNC leads 1 • WEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 7.8x WEX's $2.7B. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WEX's 11.5%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $7.3B | $11.7B | $21.1B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $1.7B | $3.4B | $7.5B | $952M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $810M | $1.1B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $310M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $1.3B | $2.7B | $4.0B | $460M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +31.3% | +37.6% | +60.8% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +17.1% | +17.0% | +24.4% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +15.0% | +22.9% | +15.2% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +17.7% | +23.6% | +19.0% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +7.8% | +30.1% | -2.0% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +15.1% | +30.6% | -29.1% | +22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs SSNC's 3.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.6B | $17.5B | $22.5B | $29.7B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.7B | $20.4B | $25.9B | $58.0B | $8.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.83x | 21.06x | 58.00x | 8.75x | 16.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.95x | 15.69x | 6.94x | 6.82x | 7.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.62x | 1.69x | 2.38x | 0.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.66x | 12.07x | 7.11x | 6.55x | 8.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 2.53x | 2.11x | 1.40x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 6.66x | 1.62x | 1.18x | 4.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.98x | 16.52x | 8.00x | 6.83x | 15.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BR delivers a 40.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $12 for SSNC. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BR scores 8/9 vs WEX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +40.1% | +18.4% | +12.4% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +12.8% | +7.5% | +4.0% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +16.2% | +6.0% | +8.1% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +17.6% | +6.6% | +10.2% | +13.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.10x | 1.30x | 0.29x | 1.13x | 3.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $28.3B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $562M | $599M | $798M | $906M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.6B | $3.5B | $4.0B | $29.1B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.80x | 13.54x | 15.37x | 6.39x | 2.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SSNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SSNC five years ago would be worth $9,990 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, WEX leads with a +11.8% total return vs FISV's -69.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSNC at 8.7% vs FISV's -22.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | -31.7% | -33.0% | -15.4% | -4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.2% | -35.0% | -42.1% | -69.4% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.6% | +4.8% | -13.3% | -53.6% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | -0.3% | -65.1% | -52.2% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.4% | +188.5% | -18.4% | +7.1% | +58.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +1.6% | -4.6% | -22.6% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BR and WEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WEX's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WEX currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.19x | 0.65x | 0.87x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.07 | $271.91 | $82.74 | $191.91 | $186.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.06 | $148.36 | $43.28 | $52.91 | $122.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +55.0% | +52.6% | +28.9% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 38.2 | 50.8 | 39.4 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 1.4M | 5.6M | 5.3M | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BR and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSNC as "Buy", BR as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", WEX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 25.4% for WEX (target: $178). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs SSNC's 1.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $94.20 | $224.83 | $67.14 | $74.08 | $177.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 37 | 60 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.3% | +3.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 18 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $3.40 | $1.63 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | +0.8% | +6.3% | +19.9% | +16.3% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SSNC vs BR vs FIS vs FISV vs WEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(SSNC) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
Over the past 5 years, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(SSNC) delivered a total return of -0. 1%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BR returned +188. 5% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus WEX Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning WEX is approximately 456% more volatile than BR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(SSNC) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 21. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BR leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
8% yield), BR (2. 3% yield), SSNC (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FISV, WEX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSNC or BR or FIS or FISV or WEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 3% yield, +188. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BR: +188. 5%, WEX: +58. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSNC and BR and FIS and FISV and WEX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSNC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock. SSNC, BR, FIS pay a dividend while FISV, WEX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.