SSNC vs FIS vs FISV vs BR

For growth investors, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

(BR) delivered a total return of +2. 7%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BR returned +194. 1% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

(BR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning FISV is approximately 334% more volatile than BR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 130% for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.

(SSNC) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 21. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BR leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BR: 56. 7% to $239. 60.

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), BR (2. 2% yield), SSNC (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

(BR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 2. 2% yield, +194. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BR: +194. 1%, FISV: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SSNC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SSNC, FIS, BR pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.