Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
Staffing & Employment Services
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $624M | $422M | $105.94B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $946M | $429M | $24.45B | $595M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $29M | $7.21B | $109M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 81.3% | 89.2% | 103.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 2.9% | 36.8% | 20.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 5.7x | 10.9x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $318M | $5M | $6.65B | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $178M | $129M | $5.43B | $298M |
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Adobe Inc. (ADBE) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 7.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +5.7% vs FVRR's -59.7%
FVRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
- Lower P/E (5.7x vs 7.4x)
ADBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 35.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 171.1% 10Y total return vs SSTK's -34.5%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
UPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 7.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.5% margin vs SSTK's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SSTK's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs FVRR's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs SSTK's -1.5%, ROIC 51.4% vs 11.5% |
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADBE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SSTK leads 1 • FVRR leads 0 • UPWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADBE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADBE is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.5B annually — 57.0x FVRR's $429M. ADBE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSTK's -2.2%. On growth, ADBE holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $946M | $429M | $24.5B | $595M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $118M | $26M | $9.6B | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $29M | $7.2B | $109M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $114M | $103M | $10.3B | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +81.3% | +89.2% | +103.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +2.9% | +36.8% | +20.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.7% | +29.5% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +24.1% | +42.2% | +37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | -1.6% | +12.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +9.7% | +11.4% | +29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SSTK and FVRR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 39% valuation discount to FVRR's 21.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSTK's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FVRR's 22.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $624M | $422M | $105.9B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $763M | $299M | $107.2B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.59x | 20.98x | 15.36x | 12.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.68x | 10.90x | 7.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.80x | 22.11x | 11.25x | 9.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.98x | 4.46x | 1.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 1.06x | 9.42x | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.04x | 4.06x | 10.75x | 5.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FVRR and ADBE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADBE delivers a 62.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SSTK. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSTK scores 8/9 vs UPWK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | +7.0% | +62.3% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +3.1% | +24.8% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | -0.2% | +51.4% | +14.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | -0.3% | +44.6% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.01x | 0.57x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $139M | -$124M | $1.2B | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $178M | $129M | $5.4B | $298M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $318M | $5M | $6.6B | $381M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.71x | — | 66.23x | 146.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SSTK and ADBE and UPWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADBE five years ago would be worth $5,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, SSTK leads with a +5.7% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs SSTK's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | -40.3% | -23.0% | -46.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.7% | -59.7% | -33.4% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.2% | -58.1% | -25.4% | +32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -93.5% | -47.5% | -74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.5% | -70.6% | +171.1% | -49.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.1% | -25.2% | -9.3% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ADBE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADBE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSTK's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADBE currently trades 60.6% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.97x | 0.74x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.50 | $34.13 | $422.95 | $22.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.73 | $9.67 | $224.18 | $10.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +34.4% | +60.6% | +46.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 52.9 | 52.2 | 35.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 265K | 924K | 5.5M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SSTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSTK as "Hold", FVRR as "Hold", ADBE as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 294.5% upside for SSTK (target: $67) vs 34.7% for ADBE (target: $346). SSTK is the only dividend payer here at 7.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $16.83 | $345.50 | $23.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 17 | 62 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.7% | +10.6% | +9.8% |
ADBE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SSTK leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
SSTK vs FVRR vs ADBE vs UPWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adobe Inc. (ADBE) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Fiverr International Ltd. at 21. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
Over the past 5 years, Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) delivered a total return of -47. 5%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADBE returned +171. 1% versus FVRR's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Shutterstock, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SSTK is approximately 100% more volatile than ADBE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adobe Inc. grew EPS 35. 1% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADBE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus 4. 6% for Shutterstock, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADBE leads at 36. 6% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADBE leads at 88. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Adobe Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSTK: 294. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK?
In this comparison, SSTK (7.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FVRR, ADBE, UPWK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSTK or FVRR or ADBE or UPWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adobe Inc.
(ADBE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), +171. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADBE: +171. 1%, UPWK: -49. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSTK and FVRR and ADBE and UPWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSTK (Communication Services) and FVRR (Communication Services) and ADBE (Technology) and UPWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SSTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADBE is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SSTK pays a dividend while FVRR, ADBE, UPWK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.