STAG vs AMZN

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (37. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, STAG Industrial, Inc.

(STAG) is the cheapest at 26. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Amazon. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 25x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 40x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +67. 3%, compared to +29. 7% for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +730. 1% versus STAG's +153. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAG Industrial, Inc.

(STAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 177% more volatile than STAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 90% for STAG Industrial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 10. 1% for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STAG Industrial, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

STAG Industrial, Inc.

(STAG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 4% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STAG leads at 37. 7% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STAG leads at 61. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 25x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 40x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) trades at 35. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 5x for STAG Industrial, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STAG: 19. 6% to $45. 50.

In this comparison, STAG (4.

0% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.

(STAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 4. 0% yield, +153. 7% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAG: +153. 7%, AMZN: +730. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (STAG (Real Estate) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. STAG pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.