Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $15M | $548M | $834M | $668K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13K | $136M | $949M | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-9M | $-170M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | -18.9% | 37.2% | 32.4% | -27.7% |
| Operating Margin | -679.9% | 1.4% | -7.9% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 75.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $9M | $2.93B | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $21M | $205M | $47M |
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solidion Technology… (STI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 64.8 | -35.2% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.53
- Beta 1.53 vs SLDP's 2.92
CLFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- 120.7% 10Y total return vs CCOI's 14.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- Beta 1.74, current ratio 5.42x
CCOI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 18.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
SLDP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +142.1% vs CCOI's -62.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs STI's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.3% margin vs STI's -640.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs SLDP's 2.92 | |
| Dividends | 18.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.1% vs CCOI's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs STI's -165.6% |
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLDP leads 1 • STI leads 0 • CCOI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCOI is the larger business by revenue, generating $949M annually — 71063.7x STI's $13,350. CLFD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STI's -640.9%. On growth, CCOI holds the edge at -3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13,350 | $136M | $949M | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $6M | $174M | -$83M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$9M | -$170M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $16M | -$208M | -$75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | +37.2% | +32.4% | -27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -679.9% | +1.4% | -7.9% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -640.9% | -6.3% | -17.9% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -415.4% | +11.8% | -21.9% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -27.1% | -3.2% | -48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.2% | -142.5% | +23.9% | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SLDP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CCOI's 21.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 65.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $548M | $834M | $668,194 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $535M | $3.6B | -$38M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | -69.03x | -4.38x | -6.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 75.91x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 64.96x | 21.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.65x | 0.85x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.19x | — | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.18x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. SLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLFD's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs STI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.4% | -2.3% | -21.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -165.6% | -3.0% | -5.4% | -23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.6% | -3.1% | -19.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.8% | -3.6% | -23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$908,270 | -$13M | $2.7B | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $21M | $205M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $9M | $2.9B | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.11x | 65.80x | -0.52x | -488.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CLFD and SLDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $11,247 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $104 for STI. Over the past 12 months, SLDP leads with a +142.1% total return vs CCOI's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLDP at 11.3% vs STI's -78.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.9% | +35.8% | -19.2% | -33.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.9% | +25.8% | -62.0% | +142.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +11.0% | -59.5% | +37.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +12.5% | -57.9% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +120.7% | +14.0% | -69.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.5% | +3.5% | -26.0% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STI and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STI is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDP's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs STI's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.74x | 1.75x | 2.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.99 | $46.76 | $54.37 | $8.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.94 | $24.01 | $14.82 | $1.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +85.6% | +30.6% | +34.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 77.4 | 33.7 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 163K | 1.2M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", SLDP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.1% upside for CCOI (target: $24) vs 8.2% for CLFD (target: $43). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 18.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.33 | $24.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 32 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +2.0% | +100.0% |
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLDP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
STI vs CLFD vs CCOI vs SLDP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of +12. 5%, compared to -99. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +120. 7% versus STI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solidion Technology Inc.
(STI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Solid Power, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning SLDP is approximately 91% more volatile than STI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Clearfield, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -100. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -257. 4% for Solidion Technology Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLDP leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP?
Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 4% net margin versus -640. 9% for Solidion Technology Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLFD leads at 1. 4% versus -679. 9% for STI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 46.
1% to $24. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP?
In this comparison, CCOI (18.
8% yield) pays a dividend. STI, CLFD, SLDP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is STI or CLFD or CCOI or SLDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (18. 8% yield). Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCOI: +14. 0%, SLDP: -69. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STI and CLFD and CCOI and SLDP?
These companies operate in different sectors (STI (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and SLDP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SLDP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CCOI pays a dividend while STI, CLFD, SLDP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.