STI
Solidion Technology Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$15M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
STI vs FLUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-62.9%
STI vs FLUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | STI | FLUX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $15M | $18M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13K | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | -18.9% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -679.9% | -1.9% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1M |
STI vs FLUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
STI
FLUX
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solidion Technology… (STI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 37.1 | -62.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STI vs FLUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLUX leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Solidion Technology Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STI
Solidion Technology Inc.
The Income Pick
STI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.53
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play
FLUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- -76.0% 10Y total return vs STI's -97.8%
- 9.2% revenue growth vs STI's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLUX | 9.2% revenue growth vs STI's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | FLUX | -12.5% margin vs STI's -640.9% |
| Stability / Safety | STI | Beta 1.53 vs FLUX's 2.23 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | STI | -33.9% vs FLUX's -48.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLUX | -21.0% ROA vs STI's -165.6% |
STI vs FLUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
Segment breakdown not available.
STI vs FLUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLUXLAGGINGSTI
STISolidion Technology I…
1leads
FLUXFlux Power Holdings, …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs STIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLUX4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLUX1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLUX3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLUX5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
STI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $51M annually — 3791.8x STI's $13,350. FLUX is the more profitable business, keeping -12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STI's -640.9%.
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13,350 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$212,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | +32.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -679.9% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -640.9% | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -415.4% | -14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.2% | -25.0% |
FLUX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $18M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $32M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | -2.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
FLUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLUX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs STI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -165.6% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -30.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$908,270 | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.11x | -1.19x |
FLUX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLUX five years ago would be worth $1,158 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $104 for STI. Over the past 12 months, STI leads with a -33.9% total return vs FLUX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLUX at -35.9% vs STI's -78.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.9% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.9% | -48.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -88.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -76.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.5% | -35.9% |
FLUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STI is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUX's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.99 | $7.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.94 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +13.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 127K |
STI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | STISolidion Technolo… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FLUX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallFlux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
STI vs FLUX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STI or FLUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the stronger pick with 9. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STI or FLUX?
Over the past 5 years, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) delivered a total return of -88. 4%, compared to -99. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLUX returned -76. 0% versus STI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STI or FLUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solidion Technology Inc.
(STI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Flux Power Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning FLUX is approximately 45% more volatile than STI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — STI or FLUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is pulling ahead at 9. 2% versus -100. 0% for Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flux Power Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -257. 4% for Solidion Technology Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STI or FLUX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 0% net margin versus -640. 9% for Solidion Technology Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUX leads at -7. 6% versus -679. 9% for STI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUX leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — STI or FLUX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is STI or FLUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Solidion Technology Inc.
(STI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STI: -97. 8%, FLUX: -76. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between STI and FLUX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(STI: -100.0% · FLUX: -60.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.