Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STLA vs GM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
STLA vs GM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $20.86B | $68.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $337.43B | $184.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20.81B | $2.54B |
| Gross Margin | 5.5% | 6.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $45.95B | $130.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30.15B | $20.95B |
STLA vs GM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 294.2 | +194.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STLA vs GM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STLA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth -5.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3%
- 11.0% yield, vs GM's 0.9%
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.9%
- 175.0% 10Y total return vs STLA's 133.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 1.17x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs STLA's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs STLA's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 11.0% yield, vs GM's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.2% vs STLA's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs STLA's -10.3%, ROIC 1.3% vs -25.3% |
STLA vs GM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STLA vs GM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $337.4B annually — 1.8x GM's $184.6B. GM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STLA's -6.2%. On growth, STLA holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $337.4B | $184.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7.0B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20.8B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21.0B | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +6.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.0% | -15.2% |
Valuation Metrics
STLA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.9B | $68.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.3B | $178.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.68x | 23.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.36x | 6.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-29 for STLA. STLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GM's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs STLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.5% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.3% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | $109.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30.1B | $20.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.9B | $130.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.14x | 2.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $13,532 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,811 for STLA. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +69.2% total return vs STLA's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 32.7% vs STLA's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.0% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | +69.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +133.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +35.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.2% | +175.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.1% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STLA's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs STLA's 58.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.22 | $87.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.29 | $44.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.9% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.5M | 6.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STLA and GM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STLA as "Hold" and GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for STLA (target: $11) vs 20.5% for GM (target: $92). For income investors, STLA offers the higher dividend yield at 11.01% vs GM's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.76 | $91.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.8% |
GM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STLA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STLA vs GM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STLA or GM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stellantis N.
V. (STLA) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STLA or GM?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STLA or GM?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +35.
3%, compared to -31. 9% for Stellantis N. V. (STLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +175. 0% versus STLA's +133. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STLA or GM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Stellantis N. V. 's 1. 52β — meaning STLA is approximately 42% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stellantis N. V. (STLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 2% for General Motors Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STLA or GM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stellantis N.
V. (STLA) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: General Motors Company grew EPS -48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -594. 6% for Stellantis N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GM leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STLA or GM?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
5% net margin versus -14. 6% for Stellantis N. V. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus -14. 5% for STLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GM leads at 10. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STLA or GM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
0x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Stellantis N. V. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STLA: 49. 4% to $10. 76.
08Which pays a better dividend — STLA or GM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stellantis N. V. (STLA) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 0. 9% for General Motors Company (GM).
09Is STLA or GM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +175. 0% 10Y return). Stellantis N. V. (STLA) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +175. 0%, STLA: +133. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STLA and GM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STLA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.