Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Consulting Services
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Consulting Services | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $10.40B | $8.00B | $3.12B | $5.86B | $112.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.47B | $4.91B | $582M | $7.49B | $29.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $448M | $440M | $106M | $248M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 19.5% | 40.1% | 10.4% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 12.4% | 20.6% | 4.9% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 20.0x | 30.9x | 18.1x | 57.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $987M | $83M | $1.28B | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $167M | $222M | $541M | $440M |
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 194.5 | +94.5% |
| Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, STN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TTEK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.53 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage
EXPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.9%, current ratio 2.40x
- 18.2% margin vs PRIM's 3.3%
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- PEG 0.98 vs EXPO's 5.18
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs PRIM's 402.0%
- 19.8% revenue growth vs EXPO's 4.2%
- +132.1% vs EXPO's -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs EXPO's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.2% margin vs PRIM's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.1% vs EXPO's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs PWR's 4.8%, ROIC 36.3% vs 11.8% |
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXPO leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • STN leads 0 • TTEK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 51.5x EXPO's $582M. EXPO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRIM's 3.3%. On growth, PWR holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $4.9B | $582M | $7.5B | $30.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $961M | $666M | $125M | $437M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $448M | $440M | $106M | $248M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $669M | $122M | $165M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +19.5% | +40.1% | +10.4% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +12.4% | +20.6% | +4.9% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +9.0% | +18.2% | +3.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +13.6% | +21.0% | +2.2% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +10.6% | +7.8% | -5.4% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +16.8% | +6.5% | -60.5% | +51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.4B | $8.0B | $3.1B | $5.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $8.8B | $3.0B | $6.6B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.23x | 33.00x | 30.65x | 21.52x | 110.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 20.04x | 30.87x | 18.06x | 57.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.08x | 4.07x | 5.15x | 1.17x | 6.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.59x | 13.28x | 22.99x | 13.03x | 45.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 1.47x | 5.37x | 0.77x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.82x | 4.61x | 8.33x | 3.52x | 12.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.14x | 18.23x | 25.54x | 17.20x | 69.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPO delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTEK scores 7/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +24.4% | +25.5% | +15.2% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +10.2% | +13.7% | +5.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +17.4% | +36.3% | +13.6% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +20.6% | +19.2% | +16.3% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.55x | 0.21x | 0.76x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $820M | -$139M | $735M | $748M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $167M | $222M | $541M | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $987M | $83M | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.18x | 19.86x | — | 21.02x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,147 for EXPO. Over the past 12 months, PWR leads with a +132.1% total return vs EXPO's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 64.7% vs EXPO's -8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | -8.6% | -9.1% | -17.2% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.5% | +0.2% | -13.6% | +62.4% | +132.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | +11.5% | -24.4% | +346.5% | +345.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.8% | +28.0% | -28.5% | +234.4% | +651.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.5% | +450.1% | +186.1% | +402.0% | +3143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +3.7% | -8.9% | +64.7% | +64.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.53x | 0.89x | 1.83x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.52 | $43.14 | $81.95 | $205.50 | $788.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.08 | $29.59 | $63.25 | $65.23 | $315.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +71.1% | +77.4% | +52.6% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 42.7 | 38.6 | 30.3 | 87.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 250K | 2.7M | 452K | 1.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
EXPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STN as "Hold", TTEK as "Hold", EXPO as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", PWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, EXPO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs PRIM's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.07 | $41.50 | $85.00 | $160.63 | $647.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 26 | 8 | 22 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.8% | +1.9% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.24 | $1.20 | $0.32 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +3.1% | +0.2% | +0.1% |
EXPO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STN vs TTEK vs EXPO vs PRIM vs PWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Exponent, Inc. 's 5. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -28. 5% for Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus EXPO's +186. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 243% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 4. 2% for Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primoris Services Corporation grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
Exponent, Inc.
(EXPO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Quanta Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPO leads at 20. 6% versus 5. 5% for PRIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STN leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Exponent, Inc. 's 5. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR?
In this comparison, EXPO (1.
9% yield), TTEK (0. 8% yield), STN (0. 7% yield), PRIM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PWR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STN or TTEK or EXPO or PRIM or PWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +450. 1% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +450. 1%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STN and TTEK and EXPO and PRIM and PWR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. STN, TTEK, EXPO pay a dividend while PRIM, PWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.