Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $26.38B | $3.58B | $60.05B | $4.83B | $50.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $785M | $490M | $907M | $7.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12.36B | $-261M | $-12.36B | $-1.31B | $801M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 41.4% | 68.1% | -47.7% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 94.2% | -26.4% | 94.2% | -90.6% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 12.5x | 2.4x | — | 66.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.28B | $824M | $8.28B | $3.65B | $7.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.30B | $43M | $2.30B | $547M | $11.29B |
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroStrategy Incor… (STRK) | 100 | 97.5 | -2.5% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 66.2 | -33.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
- Beta 1.02, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.62x
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 66.1x)
CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
- +74.1% vs MSTR's -54.2%
MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs STRK's 8.9%
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
- 2.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 5.7% vs -9.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 66.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs CLSK's 3.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CLSK's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.1% vs MSTR's -54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 5.7% vs -9.9% |
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 1 of 6 categories
STRK leads 1 • CLSK leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • COIN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STRK and MSTR each lead in 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 14.6x MSTR's $490M. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $785M | $490M | $907M | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $480M | $181M | $480M | $627M | $202M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12.4B | -$261M | -$12.4B | -$1.3B | $801M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.6B | -$1.0B | $7.6B | -$312M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +41.4% | +68.1% | -47.7% | +74.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | -26.4% | +94.2% | -90.6% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | -33.2% | -25.2% | -144.6% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -133.1% | +15.5% | -34.4% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +11.6% | +11.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -132.0% | -2.6% | -132.0% | -4.8% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STRK and CLSK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 71% valuation discount to COIN's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COIN's 29.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.4B | $3.6B | $60.1B | $4.8B | $51.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.4B | $4.4B | $66.0B | $7.9B | $47.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.19x | 12.48x | -11.81x | -3.44x | 43.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | — | 2.37x | — | 66.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.53x | — | — | 29.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 55.27x | 4.67x | 125.83x | 5.32x | 7.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 2.04x | 1.04x | 1.30x | 3.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 21.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CLSK and COIN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. STRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | -13.7% | -24.1% | -30.5% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -8.5% | -19.4% | -17.1% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.9% | +10.3% | -9.9% | -9.0% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | +13.7% | -12.6% | -12.1% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.38x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.0B | $781M | $6.0B | $3.1B | -$3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $43M | $2.3B | $547M | $11.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $824M | $8.3B | $3.6B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | -18.49x | 9.05x | 4.73x | 16.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $28,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, CLSK leads with a +74.1% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 82.7% vs STRK's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | +21.0% | +14.4% | +28.2% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.9% | +74.1% | -54.2% | -4.7% | -1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | +229.7% | +510.2% | +36.1% | +232.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | -26.9% | +189.8% | -59.5% | -26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | -84.3% | +855.6% | -51.6% | -41.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +48.8% | +82.7% | +10.8% | +49.2% |
Risk & Volatility
STRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRK is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSK's 3.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRK currently trades 61.0% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 3.39x | 2.59x | 3.11x | 3.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.48 | $23.61 | $457.22 | $23.45 | $444.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.60 | $7.91 | $104.17 | $6.66 | $139.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.0% | +59.2% | +39.3% | +54.2% | +43.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 71.5 | 68.8 | 69.6 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 19.0M | 18.8M | 47.6M | 10.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRK and CLSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLSK as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", COIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.2% upside for MSTR (target: $281) vs 26.1% for COIN (target: $243). For income investors, STRK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.64% vs CLSK's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.21 | $280.83 | $16.13 | $243.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 29 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.2% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $0.03 | $1.30 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.6% |
MSTR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). STRK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
STRK vs CLSK vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, MicroStrategy Incorporated is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +189.
8%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +855. 6% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
02β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 39β — meaning CLSK is approximately 232% more volatile than STRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) trades at 1.
0x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 65. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 56. 2% to $280. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN?
In this comparison, STRK (1.
6% yield), MSTR (0. 7% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MARA, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STRK or CLSK or MSTR or MARA or COIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
02), 1. 6% yield). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRK: +8. 9%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRK and CLSK and MSTR and MARA and COIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRK (Technology) and CLSK (Technology) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. STRK, MSTR pay a dividend while CLSK, MARA, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.