Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRS vs CLPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
STRS vs CLPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $239M | $50M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | -7.0% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 124.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $210M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $31M |
STRS vs CLPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratus Properties … (STRS) | 100 | 175.7 | +75.7% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRS vs CLPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 213.7%, EPS growth 113.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 49.0% 10Y total return vs CLPR's -50.9%
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- -13.0% margin vs STRS's -25.4%
- 13.9% yield, vs STRS's 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs CLPR's 3.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.0% margin vs STRS's -25.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 13.9% yield, vs STRS's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.8% vs CLPR's -14.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs CLPR's -1.6%, ROIC -0.3% vs 0.6% |
STRS vs CLPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRS vs CLPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPR is the larger business by revenue, generating $153M annually — 4.8x STRS's $32M. CLPR is the more profitable business, keeping -13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRS's -25.4%. On growth, CLPR holds the edge at -2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +80.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.4% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -147.4% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STRS's 125.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $50M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $20M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 124.17x | -6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 125.94x | 0.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.41x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRS five years ago would be worth $11,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,757 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, STRS leads with a +62.8% total return vs CLPR's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRS at 3.7% vs CLPR's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.8% | -14.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | -42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
STRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRS currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CLPR's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.93 | $4.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.35 | $2.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.93% vs STRS's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% |
CLPR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STRS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
STRS vs CLPR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRS or CLPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the stronger pick with 213. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) offers the better valuation at 124. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRS or CLPR?
Over the past 5 years, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) delivered a total return of +18. 1%, compared to -42. 4% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRS returned +49. 0% versus CLPR's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRS or CLPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately 12% more volatile than STRS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — STRS or CLPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is pulling ahead at 213. 7% versus 3. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratus Properties Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -88. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRS leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STRS or CLPR?
Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPR leads at 2. 7% versus -4. 0% for STRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPR leads at 80. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — STRS or CLPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 9%, versus 0. 2% for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS).
07Is STRS or CLPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 13. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPR: -50. 9%, STRS: +49. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between STRS and CLPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CLPR pays a dividend while STRS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.