Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $239M | $50M | $756M | $24.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $153M | $252M | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-20M | $-32M | $954M |
| Gross Margin | -7.0% | 80.2% | 91.1% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | 2.7% | 11.5% | 28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 124.2x | — | — | 47.7x |
| Total Debt | $210M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $8.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $31M | $14M | $56M |
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratus Properties … (STRS) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 213.7%, EPS growth 113.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 49.0% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 70.7%, current ratio 0.70x
- 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 13.9% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- Beta 0.62, yield 7.1%, current ratio 0.48x
EQR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 30.6% margin vs STRS's -25.4%
- Beta 0.38 vs CLPR's 0.95
- 4.6% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.6% margin vs STRS's -25.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 13.9% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.8% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.1% |
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EQR leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLPR leads 1 • STRS leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 97.8x STRS's $32M. EQR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRS's -25.4%. On growth, EQR holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $153M | $252M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $36M | $125M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$20M | -$32M | $954M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | $7M | $79M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +80.2% | +91.1% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +2.7% | +11.5% | +28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.4% | -13.0% | -12.7% | +30.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -147.4% | +4.5% | +31.2% | +42.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -2.6% | +0.5% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | -5.3% | 0.0% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 82% valuation discount to STRS's 124.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STRS's 125.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $50M | $756M | $24.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $20M | $2.3B | $33.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 124.17x | -6.64x | -23.65x | 22.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 47.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 125.94x | 0.55x | 18.60x | 15.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.41x | 0.33x | 3.01x | 7.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | — | 2.52x | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.23x | 9.05x | 19.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. STRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EQR scores 6/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | — | -10.1% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | -1.6% | -1.7% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +0.3% | +1.5% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | — | 5.18x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | -$31M | $1.5B | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $31M | $14M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210M | $0 | $1.6B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.47x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRS five years ago would be worth $11,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,757 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, STRS leads with a +62.8% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQR at 5.5% vs CLPR's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -9.7% | +2.6% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.8% | -14.2% | -15.2% | -2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | -23.0% | -15.5% | +17.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | -42.4% | -23.0% | +6.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | -50.9% | +211.1% | +29.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | -8.3% | -5.5% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
EQR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQR is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQR currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs CLPR's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.92x | 0.61x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.93 | $4.61 | $38.30 | $71.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.35 | $2.83 | $23.79 | $57.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +67.7% | +77.8% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 42.2 | 71.0 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 70K | 216K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPR and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRS as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", EQR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.2% upside for EQR (target: $71) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.93% vs STRS's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $27.00 | $70.61 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 10 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +13.9% | +7.1% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.43 | $2.11 | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
EQR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STRS vs CLPR vs NXRT vs EQR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the stronger pick with 213. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (47. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Stratus Properties Inc. at 124. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
Over the past 5 years, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) delivered a total return of +18. 1%, compared to -42. 4% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +212. 1% versus CLPR's -51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equity Residential (EQR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
37β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CLPR is approximately 153% more volatile than EQR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is pulling ahead at 213. 7% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratus Properties Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRS leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus -4. 0% for STRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQR: 7.
2% to $70. 61.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 9%, versus 0. 2% for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS).
09Is STRS or CLPR or NXRT or EQR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equity Residential (EQR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
37), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQR: +28. 9%, STRS: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRS and CLPR and NXRT and EQR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CLPR, NXRT, EQR pay a dividend while STRS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.