Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
REIT - Residential
Medical - Devices
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Conglomerates | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | REIT - Residential | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $8K | $139M | $3.72B | $756M | $68M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $223K | $435M | $1.54B | $252M | $27M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-723K | $-35M | $139M | $-32M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 2.3% | 48.7% | 91.1% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -40.9% | -3.3% | 12.2% | 11.5% | -37.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.6x | 15.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $211M | $898M | $1.56B | $680K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $864K | $11M | $449M | $14M | $22M |
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharps Technology, … (STSS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NN, Inc. (NNBR) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 33.4 | -66.6% |
| Sensus Healthcare, … (SRTS) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 99.1% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3%
NNBR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +50.8% vs STSS's -59.9%
MMSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs SRTS's -29.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- Beta 0.62 vs STSS's 2.56
- 7.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, SRTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.1% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs STSS's -324.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs STSS's 2.56 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.8% vs STSS's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs SRTS's -13.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs -25.3% |
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMSI leads in 1 of 6 categories
NNBR leads 1 • NXRT leads 1 • STSS leads 0 • SRTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MMSI and NXRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 6924.7x STSS's $222,722. MMSI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STSS's -3.2%. On growth, NNBR holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $222,722 | $435M | $1.5B | $252M | $27M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $22M | $290M | $125M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$723,347 | -$35M | $139M | -$32M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$1M | $274M | $79M | $449,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +2.3% | +48.7% | +91.1% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.9% | -3.3% | +12.2% | +11.5% | -37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -8.0% | +9.0% | -12.7% | -28.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.2% | -0.3% | +17.8% | +31.2% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.1% | +7.8% | +0.5% | -62.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.0% | -8.7% | +38.8% | 0.0% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MMSI and NXRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MMSI's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNBR's 19.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7,830 | $139M | $3.7B | $756M | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $338M | $4.2B | $2.3B | $46M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -2.58x | 29.26x | -23.65x | -8.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.60x | 15.46x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.03x | 13.06x | 18.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.33x | 2.45x | 3.01x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.93x | 2.38x | 2.52x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.16x | 17.24x | 9.05x | 203.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-28 for NNBR. SRTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs NNBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | -28.4% | +8.9% | -10.1% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | -7.7% | +5.2% | -1.7% | -13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -120.0% | -4.5% | +7.2% | +1.1% | -25.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -153.7% | -5.0% | +7.9% | +1.5% | -19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 1.44x | 0.57x | 5.18x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $200M | $450M | $1.5B | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $864,041 | $11M | $449M | $14M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $211M | $898M | $1.6B | $680,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.20x | -0.74x | 10.74x | 0.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRTS five years ago would be worth $12,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for STSS. Over the past 12 months, NNBR leads with a +50.8% total return vs STSS's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNBR at 40.7% vs STSS's -92.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.5% | +106.0% | -27.9% | +2.6% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.9% | +50.8% | -33.8% | -15.2% | -2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +178.4% | -26.5% | -15.5% | +37.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -63.4% | -3.6% | -23.0% | +20.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -75.7% | +214.6% | +211.1% | -29.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.9% | +40.7% | -9.8% | -5.5% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNBR and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STSS's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNBR currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs STSS's 10.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.56x | 2.04x | 0.71x | 0.62x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.23 | $2.99 | $100.19 | $38.30 | $5.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.42 | $1.10 | $59.74 | $23.79 | $3.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.3% | +92.3% | +62.2% | +77.8% | +69.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 65.6 | 34.9 | 71.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 327K | 936K | 769K | 216K | 54K |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNBR as "Buy", MMSI as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.4% upside for MMSI (target: $95) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). NXRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $95.00 | $27.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 13 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +7.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.4% |
MMSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NNBR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
STSS vs NNBR vs MMSI vs NXRT vs SRTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 3% for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NN, Inc. (NNBR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
On forward P/E, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
(SRTS) delivered a total return of +20. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Sharps Technology, Inc. (STSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus STSS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Sharps Technology, Inc. 's 2. 56β — meaning STSS is approximately 310% more volatile than NXRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -34. 3% for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Merit Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -324. 8% for Sharps Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMSI leads at 12. 2% versus -40. 9% for STSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 43. 6x for NN, Inc. — 28. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMSI: 52. 4% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. STSS, NNBR, MMSI, SRTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STSS or NNBR or MMSI or NXRT or SRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Sharps Technology, Inc. (STSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, STSS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STSS and NNBR and MMSI and NXRT and SRTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (STSS (Healthcare) and NNBR (Industrials) and MMSI (Healthcare) and NXRT (Real Estate) and SRTS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SRTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NXRT pays a dividend while STSS, NNBR, MMSI, SRTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.