Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $4.02B | $6.59B | $355.61B | $49.63B | $197.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $2.86B | $49.28B | $11.60B | $93.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.84B | $285M | $13.70B | $2.04B | $8.24B |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 72.0% | 61.7% | 72.0% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | -71.7% | 14.3% | 29.3% | 19.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 19.5x | 25.3x | 17.8x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $742M | $45.49B | $7.38B | $49.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $1.40B | $10.27B | $1.87B | $9.16B |
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STUB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ETSY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.26 vs PEP's 5.11
- Better valuation composite
- 27.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
- 13.1% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -39.1%
EBAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 382.5% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 1.10x
- Beta 0.77, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
PEP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.9%
- 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs STUB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs STUB's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs STUB's -47.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -39.1% |
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETSY leads 1 • EBAY leads 1 • STUB leads 0 • PEP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $93.9B annually — 52.4x STUB's $1.8B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -102.3%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $2.9B | $49.3B | $11.6B | $93.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $508M | $15.5B | $2.6B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.8B | $285M | $13.7B | $2.0B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $673M | $12.6B | $1.7B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +72.0% | +61.7% | +72.0% | +54.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +14.3% | +29.3% | +19.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -102.3% | +9.9% | +27.8% | +17.6% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +23.5% | +25.5% | +14.5% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +3.1% | +12.1% | +19.5% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +189.2% | +2.2% | +18.2% | +5.7% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STUB and ETSY and PEP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, PEP trades at a 52% valuation discount to ETSY's 50.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $6.6B | $355.6B | $49.6B | $197.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $5.9B | $390.8B | $55.1B | $237.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.99x | 49.99x | 27.18x | 25.03x | 24.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.83x | 19.46x | 25.27x | 17.76x | 16.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | 7.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.64x | 26.39x | 21.42x | 16.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.29x | 7.42x | 4.47x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | — | 10.40x | 10.83x | 9.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 10.32x | 67.15x | 29.88x | 25.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-94 for STUB. STUB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs STUB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -94.3% | — | +41.1% | +44.1% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.4% | +10.6% | +13.1% | +11.5% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.1% | — | +15.8% | +16.8% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | +22.9% | +17.3% | +17.4% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | — | 1.33x | 1.60x | 2.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $265M | -$653M | $35.2B | $5.5B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $1.4B | $10.3B | $1.9B | $9.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $742M | $45.5B | $7.4B | $49.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.89x | 27.47x | 10.70x | 10.52x | 10.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $17,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,080 for ETSY. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +41.8% total return vs STUB's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBAY at 35.4% vs STUB's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | +21.3% | +20.3% | +25.5% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.9% | +17.2% | +17.2% | +41.8% | +13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | -23.2% | +47.0% | +148.2% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | -59.2% | +65.6% | +72.6% | +14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +626.0% | +121.1% | +382.5% | +82.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | -8.4% | +13.7% | +35.4% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs STUB's 41.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.23x | -0.20x | 0.77x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.89 | $76.52 | $84.04 | $119.31 | $171.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.74 | $44.00 | $65.35 | $72.84 | $127.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +90.8% | +98.3% | +91.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 64.5 | 60.6 | 51.3 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 2.8M | 12.7M | 5.2M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STUB as "Hold", ETSY as "Buy", KO as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for PEP (target: $168) vs 1.2% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs EBAY's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.13 | $70.88 | $86.13 | $109.87 | $167.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 45 | 48 | 68 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +1.1% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 56 | 7 | 54 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $1.15 | $5.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +11.8% | +0.2% | +5.0% | +0.5% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ETSY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
STUB vs ETSY vs KO vs EBAY vs PEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
On trailing P/E, PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) is the cheapest at 24. 0x versus Etsy, Inc. at 50. 0x. On forward P/E, PepsiCo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +72. 6%, compared to -59. 2% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETSY returned +626. 0% versus STUB's -47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning STUB is approximately -983% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -1. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -37. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STUB leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -109. 2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -73. 4% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STUB leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PEP: 16. 4% to $167. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP?
In this comparison, PEP (3.
9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. STUB, ETSY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STUB or ETSY or KO or EBAY or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, STUB: -47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STUB and ETSY and KO and EBAY and PEP?
These companies operate in different sectors (STUB (Technology) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and PEP (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STUB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. KO, EBAY, PEP pay a dividend while STUB, ETSY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.