SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) offers the better valuation at 41. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

58β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 45% more volatile than SUGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 15% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SUGP leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUGP leads at 6. 0% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUGP: -89. 2%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SUGP (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and AEYE (Technology) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.