Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Software - Application
Waste Management
Waste Management
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Construction Materials | Software - Application | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $59M | $356K | $100M | $207M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198M | $9M | $40M | $59M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-25M | $-3M | $-18M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 14.0% | 78.3% | 4.1% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.1% | -237.8% | -7.9% | -26.3% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 41.3x | — | — | — | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $110K | $721K | $4M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $671K | $5M | $12M | $124M |
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SU Group Holdings L… (SUGP) | 100 | 11.7 | -88.3% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 154.1 | +54.1% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 100.1 | +0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.58, Low D/E 7.5%, current ratio 2.54x
- Beta 1.58, current ratio 2.54x
- Lower P/E (41.3x vs 63.9x)
RETO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +26.2% vs RETO's -95.9%
CWST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (41.3x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.4% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs AEYE's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.2% vs RETO's -95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 2.6% vs -14.5% |
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RETO leads in 1 of 6 categories
PESI leads 1 • CWST leads 1 • SUGP leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RETO and AEYE and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 216.8x RETO's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.4% (CWST) to -2.9% (RETO). On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198M | $9M | $40M | $59M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$19M | -$504,000 | -$14M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$25M | -$3M | -$18M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$7M | $2M | -$14M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +14.0% | +78.3% | +4.1% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -2.4% | -7.9% | -26.3% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -2.9% | -7.6% | -30.1% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -77.8% | +5.5% | -23.4% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.5% | +49.0% | +7.9% | -20.1% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | +98.8% | +29.0% | -110.5% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RETO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.3x trailing earnings, SUGP trades at a 94% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUGP's 29.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59M | $355,799 | $100M | $207M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | -$205,956 | $96M | $200M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.27x | -0.04x | -32.36x | -14.89x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.41x | — | — | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 0.19x | 2.49x | 3.36x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.51x | 0.01x | 20.91x | 4.11x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.56x | — | — | — | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SUGP and RETO and CWST each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RETO scores 5/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | -183.4% | -47.8% | -34.5% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -75.1% | -9.5% | -20.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.0% | -14.5% | -42.4% | -21.7% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | -21.6% | -17.7% | -16.7% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.00x | 0.15x | 0.09x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | -$561,755 | -$5M | -$7M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $671,355 | $5M | $12M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $109,600 | $721,000 | $4M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.37x | -31.78x | -2.79x | -42.14x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +26.2% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.8% | -66.1% | -18.7% | -8.8% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.9% | -95.9% | -27.9% | +26.2% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -99.9% | +20.6% | +21.7% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -100.0% | -60.2% | +45.6% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -100.0% | +102.2% | +178.6% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | -92.0% | +6.4% | +6.8% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CWST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.77x | 2.29x | 1.85x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.40 | $19.55 | $16.39 | $16.50 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $0.48 | $5.31 | $8.02 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +3.3% | +49.4% | +67.7% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 43.5 | 61.3 | 41.5 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 920K | 194K | 164K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEYE and PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $18.00 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RETO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SUGP vs RETO vs AEYE vs PESI vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) offers the better valuation at 41. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
On trailing P/E, SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) is the cheapest at 41.
3x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 610% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUGP leads at 6. 0% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SUGP or RETO or AEYE or PESI or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUGP and RETO and AEYE and PESI and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (SUGP (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and AEYE (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SUGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.