Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $5.92B | $9.63B | $30.15B | $3.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $777M | $1.55B | $-92K | $5.54B | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $279M | $-327M | $1.52B | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 89.4% | 60.5% | — | 61.7% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 18.8% | — | 34.3% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 17.5x | — | 18.8x | 50.9x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $738K | $110K | $852M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $359M | $357M | $1.21B | $178M |
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 284.7 | +184.7% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 837.9 | +737.9% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| ResMed Inc. (RMD) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SUPN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LNTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs RMD's 293.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 50.9x)
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs RMD's -14.5%
RMD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.0%
- 1.0% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- 34.3% margin vs SUPN's -3.7%
- 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 50.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs SUPN's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RMD's -14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0% |
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RMD leads 2 • SUPN leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SUPN and RMD and ACAD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPN's -3.7%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $777M | $1.5B | -$92,000 | $5.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $347M | -$357M | $2.1B | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $279M | -$327M | $1.5B | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $372M | -$283M | $1.8B | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.4% | +60.5% | — | +61.7% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +18.8% | — | +34.3% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +18.0% | — | +27.4% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +24.0% | — | +31.7% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | +1.2% | — | +10.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.0% | +76.5% | +2.7% | +9.3% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 63% valuation discount to LNTH's 26.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNTH's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $5.9B | $9.6B | $30.1B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $5.6B | $9.3B | $29.8B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -76.88x | 26.69x | -24.72x | 21.76x | 9.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.12x | 17.52x | — | 18.78x | 50.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.44x | 14.61x | — | 15.51x | 26.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.19x | 3.84x | — | 5.86x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.78x | 5.72x | 8.54x | 5.11x | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 65.45x | 16.73x | — | 18.14x | 36.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RMD's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RMD scores 8/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +24.3% | -43.0% | +24.4% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +12.4% | -40.2% | +18.0% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +30.6% | -65.0% | +22.8% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +17.1% | -49.3% | +25.7% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.14x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | -$358M | -$357M | -$358M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $359M | $357M | $1.2B | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $738,000 | $110,000 | $852M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.72x | — | 66.06x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LNTH and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RMD's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RMD's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.7% | +35.3% | +16.4% | -15.2% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.0% | +13.1% | +775.0% | -14.5% | +52.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.1% | -4.0% | +1976.5% | -8.4% | +4.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.0% | +314.2% | -20.8% | +11.0% | +7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.4% | +4192.5% | -20.1% | +293.8% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | -1.4% | +174.9% | -2.9% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs RMD's 70.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.47x | 1.55x | 0.66x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.68 | $93.00 | $356.00 | $293.81 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $47.25 | $35.18 | $198.64 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +97.8% | +93.6% | +70.4% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 61.2 | 55.6 | 35.6 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 604K | 886K | 378K | 1.1M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
RMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SUPN as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", RMD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 11.0% for LNTH (target: $101). RMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.02% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $101.00 | $544.40 | $281.29 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 17 | 16 | 35 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 14 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
LNTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). RMD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
SUPN vs LNTH vs PRAX vs RMD vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Lantheus Holdings, Inc. at 26. 7x. On forward P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus ACAD's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 230% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 14% for ResMed Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -5. 4% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMD leads at 32. 7% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD?
In this comparison, RMD (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. SUPN, LNTH, PRAX, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SUPN or LNTH or PRAX or RMD or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 1. 0% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMD: +293. 8%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUPN and LNTH and PRAX and RMD and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. RMD pays a dividend while SUPN, LNTH, PRAX, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.