Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Solar
Solar
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $28M | $281.02B | $1.25B | $23.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $39.38B | $1.21B | $5.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $9.38B | $-67M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 19.9% | 22.4% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.1% | 3.9% | 4.5% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.4x | 11.8x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $0.00 | $766M | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $8.85B | $244M | $2.80B |
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 676.7 | +576.7% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 69.4 | -30.6% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUUN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 0.1%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 324.1%
- 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +157.4% vs SUUN's -68.8%
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9%
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 12.4x)
FSLR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs SUUN's -7.5%
- Beta 1.39 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SUUN's -7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs SUUN's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC 27.9% vs 9.0% |
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
FSLR leads 1 • ARRY leads 1 • SUUN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 801.4x SUUN's $49M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUUN's -7.5%. On growth, SUUN holds the edge at +27.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $39.4B | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$500,554 | $2.2B | $95M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $9.4B | -$67M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $3.6B | $58M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +19.9% | +22.4% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +3.9% | +4.5% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +23.8% | -5.6% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.2% | +9.2% | +4.8% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.4% | +16.1% | -26.1% | +23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.6% | +18.2% | -7.0% | +65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 74% valuation discount to GEV's 59.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 121.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $281.0B | $1.3B | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $272.2B | $1.8B | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.90x | 59.12x | -11.23x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.42x | 11.83x | 12.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 121.45x | 13.50x | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 7.38x | 0.98x | 4.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 23.47x | 4.80x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | 15.72x | 19.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUUN's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs SUUN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +79.7% | -20.6% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +15.2% | -4.4% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.7% | +27.9% | +9.0% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.9% | +6.6% | +8.2% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.81x | — | 2.94x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | -$8.8B | $522M | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $8.8B | $244M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $0 | $766M | $499M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.52x | — | -2.42x | 53.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,277 for SUUN. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs SUUN's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs SUUN's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.0% | +54.0% | -15.3% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.8% | +157.4% | +62.7% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +698.3% | -56.1% | +20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +698.3% | -67.7% | +187.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +698.3% | -77.5% | +324.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | +99.9% | -24.0% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEV and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs SUUN's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 1.78x | 2.39x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.55 | $1181.95 | $12.23 | $285.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $387.03 | $4.92 | $125.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +88.5% | +67.0% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 66.5 | 56.4 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 558K | 2.4M | 6.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.9% upside for ARRY (target: $10) vs 7.1% for GEV (target: $1120).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $9.67 | $251.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 28 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FSLR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SUUN vs GEV vs ARRY vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -87. 2% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +694. 0% versus SUUN's -86. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning ARRY is approximately 75% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 4% for PowerBank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -654. 5% for PowerBank Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SUUN leads at 31. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -74. 7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -20. 3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSLR leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for GE Vernova Inc. — 25. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARRY: 17. 9% to $9. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SUUN or GEV or ARRY or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+334. 7% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +334. 7%, ARRY: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUUN and GEV and ARRY and FSLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SUUN (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and ARRY (Energy) and FSLR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SUUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.