Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Industrial - Machinery
Solar
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar | Industrial - Machinery | Solar |
| Market Cap | $28M | $3.24B | $1.32B | $15.65B | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $3.17B | $536M | $4.33B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $568M | $34M | $189M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 23.5% | 33.5% | 38.1% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.1% | -1.8% | 11.2% | 7.5% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.3x | 19.4x | 30.2x | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $14.89B | $175M | $1.33B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $1.24B | $7M | $341M | $10M |
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 142.0 | +42.0% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 198.2 | +98.2% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 175.8 | +75.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SUUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RUN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9%
- 17.9% margin vs SPWR's -13.2%
SHLS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- 3.7% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 5.9% vs -5.3%
GNRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs RUN's 86.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 50.5%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.69, yield 0.0%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.69 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 30.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 30.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs SPWR's -13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs SUUN's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 5.9% vs -5.3% |
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
GNRC leads 2 • SPWR leads 1 • SUUN leads 0 • RUN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RUN and SHLS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 88.1x SUUN's $49M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $3.2B | $536M | $4.3B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$500,554 | $541M | $73M | $472M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $568M | $34M | $189M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | -$326M | -$77M | $419M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +23.5% | +33.5% | +38.1% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | -1.8% | +11.2% | +7.5% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +17.9% | +6.3% | +4.4% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.2% | -10.3% | -14.5% | +9.7% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.4% | +43.2% | +74.9% | +12.4% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.6% | +2.1% | — | +69.9% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 92% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHLS's 22.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $3.2B | $1.3B | $15.7B | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $16.9B | $1.5B | $16.6B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.90x | 8.07x | 39.20x | 99.17x | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.26x | 19.40x | 30.18x | 5.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.31x | 22.83x | 34.39x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 1.09x | 2.77x | 3.72x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.75x | 2.20x | 5.99x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 58.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-15 for SUUN. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUUN's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs SUUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +12.4% | +5.7% | +7.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +2.5% | +3.7% | +3.4% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.7% | -0.5% | +5.9% | +5.9% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.9% | -0.6% | +7.6% | +6.9% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.81x | 2.99x | 0.29x | 0.51x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $13.6B | $168M | $992M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $1.2B | $7M | $341M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $14.9B | $175M | $1.3B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.52x | -0.02x | 5.91x | 4.54x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNRC five years ago would be worth $8,149 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,277 for SUUN. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs SUUN's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNRC at 34.2% vs SUUN's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.0% | -29.0% | -13.8% | +89.1% | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.8% | +86.7% | +66.5% | +129.9% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -19.7% | -60.2% | +141.5% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -69.8% | -72.8% | -18.5% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +86.7% | -74.7% | +666.1% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | -7.1% | -26.5% | +34.2% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GNRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs SUUN's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 2.81x | 2.23x | 1.69x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.55 | $22.44 | $11.36 | $269.58 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $5.38 | $3.81 | $113.96 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +61.5% | +69.0% | +99.0% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 49.0 | 63.2 | 77.8 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 558K | 10.4M | 5.1M | 895K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RUN as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 3.1% for GNRC (target: $275).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.25 | $9.83 | $275.11 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 23 | 39 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). GNRC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS vs GNRC vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) delivered a total return of -18. 5%, compared to -87. 2% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +673. 7% versus SUUN's -86. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning RUN is approximately 66% more volatile than GNRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for PowerBank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -654. 5% for PowerBank Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -74. 7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -20. 3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 30. 2x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SUUN or RUN or SHLS or GNRC or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+673. 7% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNRC: +673. 7%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUUN and RUN and SHLS and GNRC and SPWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SUUN (Utilities) and RUN (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and GNRC (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SUUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.