Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $379M | $11.21B | $21.05B | $13.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $67M | $1.03B | $380M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $29M | $-24M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 52.0% | 55.7% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 12.3% | -12.7% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 274.1x | 71.7x | 155.1x | 38.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $552M | $5M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $152M | $17M | $346M |
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvaco Group, Inc.… (SVCO) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 312.4 | +212.4% |
| SiTime Corporation (SITM) | 100 | 654.5 | +554.5% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.48
- Beta 1.48 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage
SMTC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SITM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.56, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 11.30x
- Beta 2.56, current ratio 11.30x
ONTO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (38.7x vs 155.1x)
- 10.3% margin vs SVCO's -41.7%
- 4.7% ROA vs SVCO's -22.6%, ROIC 5.7% vs -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.2% revenue growth vs ONTO's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.7x vs 155.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs SVCO's -41.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +379.7% vs ONTO's +118.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SVCO's -22.6%, ROIC 5.7% vs -13.6% |
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SITM leads 1 • SVCO leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SITM and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 15.4x SVCO's $67M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVCO's -41.7%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $67M | $1.0B | $380M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $173M | -$24M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $29M | -$24M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | $143M | $54M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +52.0% | +55.7% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +12.3% | -12.7% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | +2.8% | -6.4% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.4% | +13.9% | +14.3% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +12.7% | +88.3% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.6% | +67.4% | +80.2% | -48.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ONTO's 68.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 104.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $379M | $11.2B | $21.0B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $373M | $11.6B | $21.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.68x | -53.76x | -463.55x | 98.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 274.09x | 71.68x | 155.06x | 38.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 104.59x | — | 68.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.01x | 12.33x | 64.43x | 13.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.78x | 16.04x | 17.22x | 6.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 256.13x | 599.17x | 45.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-36 for SVCO. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs SVCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.8% | +5.1% | -2.1% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.6% | +2.0% | -1.9% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.6% | +4.9% | -4.9% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | +5.4% | -6.1% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.02x | 0.00x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $400M | -$12M | -$329M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $152M | $17M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $552M | $5M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.46x | 2.45x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $87,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,091 for SVCO. Over the past 12 months, SITM leads with a +379.7% total return vs ONTO's +118.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 110.7% vs SVCO's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +191.3% | +61.4% | +115.5% | +65.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.5% | +253.5% | +379.7% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +547.3% | +836.0% | +218.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +89.8% | +779.7% | +312.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +460.9% | +6033.2% | +1431.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | +86.4% | +110.7% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SVCO and SMTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SVCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMTC currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 2.73x | 2.56x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.76 | $127.19 | $845.00 | $315.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.07 | $33.06 | $158.63 | $85.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +95.5% | +94.4% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.6 | 69.3 | 76.9 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 587K | 2.4M | 427K | 832K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVCO as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy", SITM as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.8% upside for SVCO (target: $20) vs -45.3% for SITM (target: $436).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.75 | $87.44 | $436.43 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SITM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SVCO vs SMTC vs SITM vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) offers the better valuation at 98. 6x trailing P/E (38. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock (SVCO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
On forward P/E, Onto Innovation Inc.
is actually cheaper at 38. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +779.
7%, compared to -39. 1% for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock (SVCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +60. 3% versus SVCO's -39. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silvaco Group, Inc.
Common Stock (SVCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 84% more volatile than SVCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.
2% versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SVCO leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -65. 3% for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONTO leads at 13. 2% versus -21. 7% for SVCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVCO leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) trades at 38. 7x forward P/E versus 274. 1x for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock — 235. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVCO: 63. 8% to $19. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SVCO or SMTC or SITM or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, SITM: +60. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SVCO and SMTC and SITM and ONTO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.