Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $892M | $22.62B | $862M | $9.63B | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $606M | $80M | $-92K | $361M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-116M | $-1.28B | $29M | $-327M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.4% | 62.6% | — | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -194.0% | -40.9% | — | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 6.7x | — | 217.8x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $768M | $50M | $110K | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $510M | $38M | $357M | $75M |
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savara Inc. (SVRA) | 100 | 496.2 | +396.2% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 318.2 | +218.2% |
| Theravance Biopharm… (TBPH) | 100 | 90.0 | -10.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 176.6 | +76.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVRA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.54
- Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs TBPH's -8.6%
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
TBPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 28.4%, current ratio 5.02x
- Lower P/E (6.7x vs 217.8x)
- 36.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
- 7.6% ROA vs SVRA's -82.1%, ROIC -17.2% vs -47.9%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs MNKD's -26.8%
Among these 5 stocks, MNKD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 217.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs SVRA's -82.1%, ROIC -17.2% vs -47.9% |
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TBPH leads in 2 of 6 categories
MNKD leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • SVRA leads 0 • INSM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $606M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. TBPH is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $606M | $80M | -$92,000 | $361M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | -$1.2B | -$31M | -$357M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$116M | -$1.3B | $29M | -$327M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$998M | $243M | -$283M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.4% | +62.6% | — | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -194.0% | -40.9% | — | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | +36.5% | — | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -164.5% | +3.0% | — | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +152.6% | +18.5% | — | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | -16.7% | +126.9% | +2.7% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TBPH leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $892M | $22.6B | $862M | $9.6B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $904M | $22.9B | $874M | $9.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.75x | -16.35x | -14.80x | -24.72x | 177.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.69x | — | 217.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 29.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 37.30x | 13.40x | — | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.96x | 30.30x | 4.74x | 8.54x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 80.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNKD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TBPH delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-168 for INSM. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSM scores 4/9 vs SVRA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.5% | -168.4% | +14.7% | -43.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -82.1% | -57.3% | +7.6% | -40.2% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.9% | -86.5% | -17.2% | -65.0% | +21.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.5% | -66.8% | -13.8% | -49.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.04x | 0.28x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $258M | $12M | -$357M | $399M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $510M | $38M | $357M | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $768M | $50M | $110,000 | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.23x | -11.01x | — | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs MNKD's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -40.8% | -6.2% | +16.4% | -36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.6% | +53.5% | +70.4% | +775.0% | -26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.3% | +454.5% | +50.2% | +1976.5% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.6% | +221.7% | -13.8% | -20.8% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | +793.5% | -8.6% | -20.1% | -46.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.1% | +77.0% | +14.5% | +174.9% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.54x | 0.89x | 1.55x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $212.75 | $21.03 | $356.00 | $6.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.89 | $63.81 | $8.33 | $35.18 | $2.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +49.3% | +80.9% | +93.6% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 41.9 | 58.4 | 55.6 | 74.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.3M | 626K | 378K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVRA as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", TBPH as "Hold", PRAX as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 58.6% for TBPH (target: $27).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $217.11 | $27.00 | $544.40 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 35 | 16 | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TBPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNKD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SVRA vs INSM vs TBPH vs PRAX vs MNKD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). MannKind Corporation (MNKD) offers the better valuation at 177. 5x trailing P/E (217. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Savara Inc. (SVRA) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
On forward P/E, Theravance Biopharma, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus MNKD's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 186% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Theravance Biopharma, Inc. grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNKD leads at 11. 1% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBPH leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Theravance Biopharma, Inc.
(TBPH) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 211. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107. 2% to $217. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SVRA or INSM or TBPH or PRAX or MNKD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SVRA and INSM and TBPH and PRAX and MNKD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SVRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TBPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.