SVV vs TJX vs ROST vs BURL

For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.

(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) offers the better valuation at 31. 8x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) is the cheapest at 31. 8x versus Savers Value Village, Inc. at 49. 6x. On forward P/E, Savers Value Village, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Ross Stores, Inc. 's 0. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) delivered a total return of +127. 7%, compared to -63. 2% for Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +462. 2% versus SVV's -63. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Burlington Stores, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning BURL is approximately 230% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 3% for Savers Value Village, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.

(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus 2. 5% for Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burlington Stores, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Savers Value Village, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ross Stores, Inc.

(ROST) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 1. 9% for Savers Value Village, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROST leads at 11. 9% versus 7. 3% for BURL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVV leads at 56. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Ross Stores, Inc. 's 0. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 9x for Ross Stores, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVV: 125. 1% to $19. 00.

In this comparison, TJX (1.

1% yield), ROST (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SVV, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +330. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +330. 7%, SVV: -63. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TJX, ROST pay a dividend while SVV, BURL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.