Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management
Financial - Capital Markets
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $192M | $663K | $4.83B | $199M | $9.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $11M | $907M | $40M | $647M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $-7M | $-1.31B | $28M | $-867M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.4% | -47.7% | 18.0% | -15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 48.9% | -58.7% | -90.6% | -4.0% | -61.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | — | — | 6.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $32M | $8M | $3.65B | $473M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $3M | $547M | $106M | $234M |
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWK Holdings Corpor… (SWKH) | 100 | 145.9 | +45.9% |
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 1165.7 | +1065.7% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 577.6 | +477.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SWKH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 9.41x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 9.41x
- Beta 0.01 vs RIOT's 3.87
LMFA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.82
- Rev growth 77.7%, EPS growth 62.6%
- 77.7% NII/revenue growth vs SWKH's -7.8%
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 7.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- Better valuation composite
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0% (lower = leaner)
- 27.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs SWKH's 164.3%
- +207.5% vs LMFA's -85.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.7% NII/revenue growth vs SWKH's -7.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs RIOT's 3.87 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.5% vs LMFA's -85.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0% |
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWKH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RIOT leads 2 • LMFA leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • HRZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 82.5x LMFA's $11M. SWKH is the more profitable business, keeping -6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $11M | $907M | $40M | $647M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | -$264,638 | $627M | $19M | -$450M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$7M | -$1.3B | $28M | -$867M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$14M | -$312M | $67M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +36.4% | -47.7% | +18.0% | -15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | -58.7% | -90.6% | -4.0% | -61.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -66.5% | -144.6% | -6.6% | -102.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +65.8% | -124.4% | -34.4% | +141.5% | -119.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +157.1% | +100.0% | -4.8% | -29.6% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LMFA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LMFA's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SWKH's 8.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $663,265 | $4.8B | $199M | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $5M | $7.9B | $567M | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -75.71x | -0.09x | -3.44x | 4.30x | -12.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.58x | — | — | 6.10x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.94x | 3.80x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.64x | 0.06x | 5.32x | 4.97x | 14.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.02x | 1.30x | 0.60x | 2.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.05x | — | — | 3.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWKH scores 5/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | -15.3% | -30.5% | +9.0% | -28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | -12.3% | -17.1% | +3.6% | -21.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | -12.3% | -9.0% | -0.2% | -8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -16.4% | -12.1% | -0.2% | -11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 1.49x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $4M | $3.1B | $368M | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $3M | $547M | $106M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $8M | $3.6B | $473M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.40x | -3.92x | 4.73x | 0.60x | -16.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SWKH five years ago would be worth $15,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $88 for LMFA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs LMFA's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIOT at 32.0% vs LMFA's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | -51.1% | +28.2% | -26.7% | +70.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | -85.9% | -4.7% | -23.2% | +207.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | -94.6% | +36.1% | -27.7% | +129.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.8% | -99.1% | -59.5% | -32.8% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.3% | -24.6% | -51.6% | +52.9% | +787.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.8% | -62.3% | +10.8% | -10.3% | +32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SWKH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKH is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs LMFA's 4.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 2.82x | 3.11x | 0.70x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $5.14 | $23.45 | $8.46 | $24.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.32 | $0.18 | $6.66 | $3.80 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +4.6% | +54.2% | +53.3% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.4 | 43.1 | 69.6 | 58.5 | 74.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 365K | 47.6M | 1.2M | 18.4M |
Analyst Outlook
RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWKH as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for HRZN (target: $7) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). HRZN is the only dividend payer here at 27.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.13 | $6.50 | $27.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 19 | 22 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +27.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
SWKH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RIOT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LM Funding America, Inc.
(LMFA) is the stronger pick with 77. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 8% for SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
Over the past 5 years, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) delivered a total return of +57.
8%, compared to -99. 1% for LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 29682% more volatile than SWKH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LM Funding America, Inc.
(LMFA) is pulling ahead at 77. 7% versus -7. 8% for SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
1% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKH leads at 48. 9% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMFA leads at 36. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6.
1x forward P/E versus 7. 6x for SWK Holdings Corporation — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRZN: 44. 1% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SWKH, LMFA, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), +164. 3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKH: +164. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SWKH and LMFA and MARA and HRZN and RIOT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SWKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. HRZN pays a dividend while SWKH, LMFA, MARA, RIOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.