Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SWKH
SWK Holdings Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$192M
5Y Perf.+45.9%
LMFA
LM Funding America, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$663K
5Y Perf.-99.2%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+1065.7%
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$199M
5Y Perf.-61.3%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+477.6%

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SWKH logoSWKH
LMFA logoLMFA
MARA logoMARA
HRZN logoHRZN
RIOT logoRIOT
IndustryAsset ManagementFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsAsset ManagementFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$192M$663K$4.83B$199M$9.14B
Revenue (TTM)$41M$11M$907M$40M$647M
Net Income (TTM)$23M$-7M$-1.31B$28M$-867M
Gross Margin36.4%-47.7%18.0%-15.6%
Operating Margin48.9%-58.7%-90.6%-4.0%-61.8%
Forward P/E7.6x6.1x
Total Debt$32M$8M$3.65B$473M$280M
Cash & Equiv.$43M$3M$547M$106M$234M

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SWKH
LMFA
MARA
HRZN
RIOT
StockMay 20Apr 26Return
SWK Holdings Corpor… (SWKH)100145.9+45.9%
LM Funding America,… (LMFA)1000.8-99.2%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)1001165.7+1065.7%
Horizon Technology … (HRZN)10038.7-61.3%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100577.6+477.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HRZN leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SWK Holdings Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. LMFA and RIOT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SWKH
SWK Holdings Corporation
The Banking Pick

SWKH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 9.41x
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 9.41x
  • Beta 0.01 vs RIOT's 3.87
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LMFA
LM Funding America, Inc.
The Banking Pick

LMFA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.82
  • Rev growth 77.7%, EPS growth 62.6%
  • 77.7% NII/revenue growth vs SWKH's -7.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
The Banking Pick

HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.

  • NIM 7.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • Better valuation composite
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0% (lower = leaner)
  • 27.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: bank quality
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs SWKH's 164.3%
  • +207.5% vs LMFA's -85.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMFA logoLMFA77.7% NII/revenue growth vs SWKH's -7.8%
ValueHRZN logoHRZNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHRZN logoHRZNEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetySWKH logoSWKHBeta 0.01 vs RIOT's 3.87
DividendsHRZN logoHRZN27.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+207.5% vs LMFA's -85.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HRZN logoHRZNEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs LMFA's 1.0%

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SWKHSWK Holdings Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

LMFALM Funding America, Inc.
FY 2024
Mining Operations
94.8%$10M
Specialty Finance
5.2%$567,043
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
HRZNHorizon Technology Finance Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSWKHLAGGINGHRZN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 82.5x LMFA's $11M. SWKH is the more profitable business, keeping -6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$41M$11M$907M$40M$647M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$25M-$264,638$627M$19M-$450M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$23M-$7M-$1.3B$28M-$867M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M-$14M-$312M$67M-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.4%-47.7%+18.0%-15.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+48.9%-58.7%-90.6%-4.0%-61.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.1%-66.5%-144.6%-6.6%-102.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+65.8%-124.4%-34.4%+141.5%-119.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+157.1%+100.0%-4.8%-29.6%-60.0%
SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LMFA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, LMFA's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SWKH's 8.9x.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Market CapShares × price$192M$663,265$4.8B$199M$9.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$182M$5M$7.9B$567M$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-75.71x-0.09x-3.44x4.30x-12.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.58x6.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.94x3.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.64x0.06x5.32x4.97x14.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.82x0.02x1.30x0.60x2.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.05x3.51x
LMFA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWKH scores 5/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.4%-15.3%-30.5%+9.0%-28.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.3%-12.3%-17.1%+3.6%-21.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%-12.3%-9.0%-0.2%-8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%-16.4%-12.1%-0.2%-11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953353
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x0.22x1.05x1.49x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$11M$4M$3.1B$368M$46M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$43M$3M$547M$106M$234M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$32M$8M$3.6B$473M$280M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.40x-3.92x4.73x0.60x-16.47x
SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SWKH five years ago would be worth $15,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $88 for LMFA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs LMFA's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIOT at 32.0% vs LMFA's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.2%-51.1%+28.2%-26.7%+70.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.4%-85.9%-4.7%-23.2%+207.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.5%-94.6%+36.1%-27.7%+129.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+57.8%-99.1%-59.5%-32.8%-27.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.3%-24.6%-51.6%+52.9%+787.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.8%-62.3%+10.8%-10.3%+32.0%
RIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SWKH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SWKH is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs LMFA's 4.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x2.82x3.11x0.70x3.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.90$5.14$23.45$8.46$24.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.32$0.18$6.66$3.80$7.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.8%+4.6%+54.2%+53.3%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.443.169.658.574.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded17K365K47.6M1.2M18.4M
Evenly matched — SWKH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SWKH as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for HRZN (target: $7) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). HRZN is the only dividend payer here at 27.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSWKH logoSWKHSWK Holdings Corp…LMFA logoLMFALM Funding Americ…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …HRZN logoHRZNHorizon Technolog…RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$6.50$27.90
# AnalystsCovering analysts1192218
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+27.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises102
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.0%0.0%+0.0%
RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SWKH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RIOT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallSWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SWKH vs LMFA vs MARA vs HRZN vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LM Funding America, Inc.

(LMFA) is the stronger pick with 77. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 8% for SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.

1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

Over the past 5 years, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) delivered a total return of +57.

8%, compared to -99. 1% for LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

01β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 29682% more volatile than SWKH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LM Funding America, Inc.

(LMFA) is pulling ahead at 77. 7% versus -7. 8% for SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the more profitable company, earning -6.

1% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKH leads at 48. 9% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMFA leads at 36. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6.

1x forward P/E versus 7. 6x for SWK Holdings Corporation — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRZN: 44. 1% to $6. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT?

In this comparison, HRZN (27.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SWKH, LMFA, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SWKH or LMFA or MARA or HRZN or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

01), +164. 3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKH: +164. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SWKH and LMFA and MARA and HRZN and RIOT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SWKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. HRZN pays a dividend while SWKH, LMFA, MARA, RIOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SWKH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMFA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HRZN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 11.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SWKH and LMFA and MARA and HRZN and RIOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SWKH: -7.8% · LMFA: 77.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.