Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SWVL vs GRAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
SWVL vs GRAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $18M | $15.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $3.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $379M |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -27.0% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $2.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $3.43B |
SWVL vs GRAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swvl Holdings Corp. (SWVL) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 32.4 | -67.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SWVL vs GRAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SWVL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.34
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 0.65x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 0.65x
GRAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- -68.1% 10Y total return vs SWVL's -99.3%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs SWVL's -24.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs SWVL's -24.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs SWVL's -28.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs GRAB's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.7% vs SWVL's -39.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs SWVL's -28.9%, ROIC 3.3% vs -59.8% |
SWVL vs GRAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SWVL vs GRAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRAB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 194.6x SWVL's $18M. GRAB is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWVL's -28.8%. On growth, SWVL holds the edge at +30.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $379M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$765,948 | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +43.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.0% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.9% | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SWVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $15.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.55x | 59.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 36.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 4.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 112.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRAB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRAB delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SWVL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWVL scores 5/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.4% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.9% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.2% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.33x | 2.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SWVL and GRAB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRAB five years ago would be worth $3,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $75 for SWVL. Over the past 12 months, GRAB leads with a -21.7% total return vs SWVL's -39.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWVL at 16.3% vs GRAB's 4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.9% | -21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.3% | +13.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -67.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -68.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SWVL and GRAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRAB's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRAB currently trades 57.3% from its 52-week high vs SWVL's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.99 | $6.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $3.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +57.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 48.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
GRAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWVL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SWVL vs GRAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SWVL or GRAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the stronger pick with 20.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 7% for Swvl Holdings Corp. (SWVL). Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) offers the better valuation at 59. 5x trailing P/E (34. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SWVL or GRAB?
Over the past 5 years, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) delivered a total return of -67.
5%, compared to -99. 2% for Swvl Holdings Corp. (SWVL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRAB returned -68. 1% versus SWVL's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SWVL or GRAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Swvl Holdings Corp.
(SWVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Grab Holdings Limited's 1. 42β — meaning GRAB is approximately 6% more volatile than SWVL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SWVL or GRAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is pulling ahead at 20.
5% versus -24. 7% for Swvl Holdings Corp. (SWVL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to -525. 0% for Swvl Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRAB leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SWVL or GRAB?
Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
0% net margin versus -60. 1% for Swvl Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRAB leads at 6. 0% versus -49. 3% for SWVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SWVL or GRAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SWVL or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Swvl Holdings Corp.
(SWVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWVL: -99. 3%, GRAB: -68. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SWVL and GRAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SWVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.