Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$621M
5Y Perf.+114.7%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.57B
5Y Perf.+347.3%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+608.8%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.63B
5Y Perf.+523.4%
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+4937.2%

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SXC logoSXC
FANG logoFANG
MTDR logoMTDR
HCC logoHCC
AMR logoAMR
IndustryCoalOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionCoalCoal
Market Cap$621M$53.57B$6.90B$4.63B$2.52B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$15.19B$3.36B$1.47B$2.15B
Net Income (TTM)$-66M$403M$483M$138M$-36.83B
Gross Margin6.5%41.8%102.0%38.2%0.0%
Operating Margin2.1%22.1%26.3%9.7%-2.9%
Forward P/E20.1x10.7x7.7x11.4x20.0x
Total Debt$686M$14.49B$3.55B$271M$6M
Cash & Equiv.$89M$106M$79M$300M$482M

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SXC
FANG
MTDR
HCC
AMR
StockMay 20May 26Return
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC)100214.7+114.7%
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG)100447.3+347.3%
Matador Resources C… (MTDR)100708.8+608.8%
Warrior Met Coal, I… (HCC)100623.4+523.4%
Alpha Metallurgical… (AMR)1005037.2+4937.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MTDR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SXC and FANG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick

SXC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 6.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.1%
Best for: dividends
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play

FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 36.3% revenue growth vs AMR's -14.8%
Best for: growth exposure
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
The Income Pick

MTDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 59.2%, current ratio 0.79x
  • Beta 0.06, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.79x
  • Lower P/E (7.7x vs 11.4x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

HCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.

  • +92.2% vs SXC's -10.9%
  • 5.0% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 1.8% vs 4.3%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 13.2% 10Y total return vs HCC's 12.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFANG logoFANG36.3% revenue growth vs AMR's -14.8%
ValueMTDR logoMTDRLower P/E (7.7x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsMTDR logoMTDR14.4% margin vs SXC's -3.5%
Stability / SafetyMTDR logoMTDRBeta 0.06 vs AMR's 0.92
DividendsSXC logoSXC6.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)HCC logoHCC+92.2% vs SXC's -10.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HCC logoHCC5.0% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 1.8% vs 4.3%

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SXCSunCoke Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Coke Sales
84.9%$1.6B
Industrial Services
10.1%$186M
Steam And Electricity Sales
2.7%$50M
Operating And Licensing Fees
1.9%$36M
Other Products And Services
0.4%$7M
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil Exploration and Production
88.3%$25.1B
Oil Purchased
5.2%$1.5B
Natural Gas Liquids Production
5.0%$1.4B
Natural Gas, Production
1.4%$400M
MTDRMatador Resources Company
FY 2025
Oil and Gas
88.6%$3.2B
Natural Gas, Sales
6.9%$253M
Natural Gas, Midstream
4.5%$165M
HCCWarrior Met Coal, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
97.5%$1.3B
Product and Service, Other
2.5%$33M
AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
FY 2024
Coal
50.0%$2.9B
Coal, Met
48.3%$2.8B
Coal, Thermal
1.7%$100M

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSXCLAGGINGFANG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 10.3x HCC's $1.5B. MTDR is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXC's -3.5%. On growth, AMR holds the edge at +3445.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$15.2B$3.4B$1.5B$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$208M$8.6B$2.1B$289M-$19.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$66M$403M$483M$138M-$36.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$77M$1.6B$518M-$135M$4.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+6.5%+41.8%+102.0%+38.2%+0.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.1%+22.1%+26.3%+9.7%-2.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.5%+2.7%+14.4%+9.4%-1.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.2%+10.5%+15.4%-9.2%+0.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.4%+5.2%-33.2%+53.8%+3445.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.7%-98.3%-115.1%+9.6%-7.4%
MTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.1x trailing earnings, MTDR trades at a 89% valuation discount to HCC's 81.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTDR's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCC's 19.5x.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
Market CapShares × price$621M$53.6B$6.9B$4.6B$2.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$68.0B$10.4B$4.6B$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-14.08x33.24x9.12x81.27x13.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.05x10.68x7.72x11.40x20.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.54x6.83x4.34x19.52x5.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.34x3.57x1.89x3.54x0.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.00x1.28x1.15x2.16x1.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.68x10.23x28.57x6.61x
SXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MTDR delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SXC. AMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMR scores 6/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.9%+0.9%+8.2%+6.4%-2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.7%+0.6%+4.1%+5.0%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.3%+6.7%+10.5%+1.8%+13.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.3%+7.6%+11.5%+1.8%+10.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924336
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.34x0.59x0.13x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$597M$14.4B$3.5B-$29M-$476M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$89M$106M$79M$300M$482M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$686M$14.5B$3.5B$271M$6M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.18x0.66x7.88x14.30x59.79x
AMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMR five years ago would be worth $150,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,984 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, HCC leads with a +92.2% total return vs SXC's -10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCC at 32.4% vs SXC's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.5%+25.7%+29.0%-1.8%-4.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-10.9%+50.1%+42.2%+92.2%+53.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.9%+57.5%+29.9%+132.2%+22.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.8%+163.7%+105.5%+469.2%+1409.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.0%+162.5%+201.8%+1201.9%+1320.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.5%+16.3%+9.1%+32.4%+7.1%
HCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FANG and MTDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MTDR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs AMR's 76.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.09x0.06x0.57x0.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.07$214.51$66.84$105.34$253.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.52$127.75$37.14$40.80$97.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.7%+88.8%+83.1%+83.3%+76.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.349.743.648.652.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M3.4M1.8M848K280K
Evenly matched — FANG and MTDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SXC as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", MTDR as "Buy", HCC as "Hold", AMR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for HCC (target: $113) vs -2.0% for AMR (target: $190). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.61% vs AMR's 0.12%.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…MTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…AMR logoAMRAlpha Metallurgic…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.00$201.27$68.29$112.50$189.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts175142244
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.6%+2.1%+2.4%+0.4%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises60500
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$4.00$1.31$0.34$0.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.8%+0.8%+0.2%+4.9%
SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SXC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MTDR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallSunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SXC vs FANG vs MTDR vs HCC vs AMR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 8% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

On trailing P/E, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the cheapest at 9.

1x versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. at 81. 3x. On forward P/E, Matador Resources Company is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

Over the past 5 years, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.

(AMR) delivered a total return of +1410%, compared to +19. 8% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMR returned +1321% versus SXC's +68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning AMR is approximately 1386% more volatile than MTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -14. 8% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Matador Resources Company grew EPS -14. 7% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

8% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 3. 5% for HCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) trades at 7.

7x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCC: 28. 2% to $112. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 0. 1% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR).

09

Is SXC or FANG or MTDR or HCC or AMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 2. 4% yield, +201. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +201. 8%, SXC: +68. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SXC and FANG and MTDR and HCC and AMR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMR is a small-cap deep-value stock. SXC, FANG, MTDR pay a dividend while HCC, AMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SXC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FANG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTDR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HCC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 172290%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SXC and FANG and MTDR and HCC and AMR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SXC: 4.4% · FANG: 5.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.