Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $215M | $6.63B | $868M | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $219M | $2.35B | $229M | $2.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-183K | $-17M | $128M | $8M | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 86.7% | 69.7% | 43.0% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -5.9% | 4.6% | 1.4% | -7.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 58.3x | 38.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $144K | $6M | $1.12B | $0.00 | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $37M | $229M | $37M | $781M |
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syra Health Corp. C… (SYRA) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) | 100 | 76.5 | -23.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 449.4 | +349.4% |
| Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) | 100 | 266.2 | +166.2% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.19
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 6.9%, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.19 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
LFMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 220.7% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- 1.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 59.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5%
- 5.5% margin vs LFMD's -7.8%
- 6.0% ROA vs LFMD's -24.3%
TALK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
- Lower P/E (38.3x vs 58.3x)
Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.3x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs LFMD's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs LFMD's -24.3% |
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • SYRA leads 0 • LFMD leads 0 • TALK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 329.0x SYRA's $8M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LFMD's -7.8%. On growth, TALK holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $219M | $2.3B | $229M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$227,636 | -$5M | $164M | $7M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$183,089 | -$17M | $128M | $8M | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $755,858 | $15M | $73M | -$2M | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +86.7% | +69.7% | +43.0% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -5.9% | +4.6% | +1.4% | -7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -7.8% | +5.5% | +3.4% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +6.8% | +3.1% | -0.9% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | -23.6% | +28.4% | +29.3% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.8% | -16.0% | -27.3% | — | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 50.3x trailing earnings, HIMS trades at a 61% valuation discount to TALK's 129.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDOC's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 137.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $215M | $6.6B | $868M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $185M | $7.5B | $830M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | -19.52x | 50.32x | 129.50x | -6.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.29x | 38.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 42.68x | 137.77x | 15.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 1.11x | 2.82x | 3.79x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 8.75x | 12.25x | 7.69x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.61x | 89.61x | — | 4.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-162 for LFMD. SYRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TALK scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | -162.4% | +23.7% | +6.9% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -24.3% | +6.0% | +5.9% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.8% | — | +10.7% | +3.9% | -11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | -37.4% | +10.9% | +2.7% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.27x | 2.07x | — | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$30M | $892M | -$37M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $37M | $229M | $37M | $781M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143,787 | $6M | $1.1B | $0 | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.59x | -6.48x | — | — | -8.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SYRA and TALK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, SYRA leads with a +517.7% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 80.7% vs SYRA's -45.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +475.1% | +28.7% | -23.2% | +47.6% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +517.7% | -43.9% | -51.0% | +70.4% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +178.9% | +116.6% | +490.0% | -73.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | -45.8% | +137.6% | -47.7% | -95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +220.7% | +161.9% | -48.7% | -41.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.0% | +40.8% | +29.4% | +80.7% | -35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYRA and TALK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs LFMD's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 2.27x | 2.48x | 0.85x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.70 | $15.84 | $70.43 | $5.20 | $9.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $2.56 | $13.74 | $2.22 | $4.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +28.3% | +36.4% | +99.6% | +71.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 70.8 | 54.5 | 62.7 | 74.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 1.3M | 34.9M | 4.5M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LFMD as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", TALK as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 89.3% upside for LFMD (target: $9) vs 1.4% for TALK (target: $5). LFMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.50 | $26.20 | $5.25 | $7.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 19 | 10 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SYRA vs LFMD vs HIMS vs TALK vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (58. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
On trailing P/E, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the cheapest at 50. 3x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 129. 5x. On forward P/E, Talkspace, Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LFMD returned +241. 4% versus SYRA's -82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syra Health Corp.
Class A Common Stock (SYRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 584% more volatile than SYRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 85. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -12. 4% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -12. 5% for SYRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFMD leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) trades at 38. 3x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LFMD: 89. 3% to $8. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC?
In this comparison, LFMD (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SYRA, HIMS, TALK, TDOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYRA or LFMD or HIMS or TALK or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Syra Health Corp.
Class A Common Stock (SYRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36)). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYRA: -82. 0%, TDOC: -38. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYRA and LFMD and HIMS and TALK and TDOC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LFMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LFMD pays a dividend while SYRA, HIMS, TALK, TDOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.