Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Solar | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $25.30B | $1.25B | $567M | $2.50B | $536.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $1.21B | $58M | $236M | $92.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-179M | $-67M | $-151M | $-369M | $25.12B |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.4% | -39.7% | 90.7% | 68.1% |
| Operating Margin | -256.0% | 4.5% | -210.6% | -168.6% | 26.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.7x | 42.7x | — | 19.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $766M | $14M | $99M | $36.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $244M | $308M | $222M | $24.11B |
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spyre Therapeutics,… (SYRE) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 96.5 | -3.5% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 113.7 | +13.7% |
| Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 100 | 162.3 | +62.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYRE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +475.1% vs PRTA's +44.4%
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 19.2x)
PRTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 7.72x
- Beta 0.96, current ratio 7.72x
Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JNJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.2%
- 132.3% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
- 27.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
- Beta 0.06 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 19.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +475.1% vs PRTA's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC 20.7% vs -21.0% |
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JNJ leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARRY leads 1 • SYRE leads 1 • PRTA leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.1B annually — 1590.4x PRTA's $58M. JNJ is the more profitable business, keeping 27.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $1.2B | $58M | $236M | $92.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$171M | $95M | -$121M | -$391M | $31.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$179M | -$67M | -$151M | -$369M | $25.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$186M | $58M | -$85M | -$489M | $19.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +22.4% | -39.7% | +90.7% | +68.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +4.5% | -2.1% | -168.6% | +26.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -198.3% | -5.6% | -2.6% | -156.4% | +27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +4.8% | -147.2% | -2.1% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.1% | +17.1% | -39.3% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | -7.0% | +153.6% | +10.5% | +91.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JNJ's 18.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.3B | $1.3B | $567M | $2.5B | $536.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.2B | $1.8B | $273M | $2.4B | $548.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -36.92x | -11.23x | -2.32x | -7.54x | 38.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.75x | 42.68x | — | 19.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 34.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.50x | — | — | 18.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.98x | 58.54x | 10.11x | 6.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.37x | 4.80x | 2.02x | 4.22x | 7.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.72x | — | — | 27.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. PRTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARRY scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.2% | -20.6% | -49.9% | -69.0% | +31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.8% | -4.4% | -42.3% | -35.3% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | +9.0% | -21.0% | -64.1% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | +8.2% | -47.0% | -42.1% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.94x | 0.05x | 0.16x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$86M | $522M | -$294M | -$123M | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $244M | $308M | $222M | $24.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $766M | $14M | $99M | $36.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.42x | — | -13.38x | 48.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JNJ five years ago would be worth $14,611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,233 for ARRY. Over the past 12 months, SYRE leads with a +475.1% total return vs PRTA's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYRE at 164.5% vs PRTA's -48.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +139.0% | -15.3% | +14.5% | +6.5% | +7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +475.1% | +62.7% | +44.4% | +209.6% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1750.6% | -56.1% | -86.3% | +24.9% | +46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.6% | -67.7% | -57.2% | -18.6% | +46.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | -77.5% | -73.0% | +45.9% | +132.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +164.5% | -24.0% | -48.5% | +7.7% | +13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYRE and JNJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JNJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYRE currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ARRY's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 2.32x | 0.96x | 1.95x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.00 | $12.23 | $11.69 | $28.72 | $251.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.29 | $4.92 | $4.32 | $7.06 | $146.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +67.0% | +90.1% | +86.3% | +88.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 56.4 | 60.3 | 60.5 | 37.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 6.0M | 474K | 1.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JNJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYRE as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", JNJ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.4% upside for PRTA (target: $19) vs 11.8% for ARRY (target: $9). JNJ is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.90 | $9.17 | $19.00 | $30.00 | $249.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 28 | 28 | 18 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $4.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
JNJ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SYRE vs ARRY vs PRTA vs RCUS vs JNJ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) offers the better valuation at 38. 4x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. (SYRE) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
Over the past 5 years, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) delivered a total return of +46.
1%, compared to -67. 7% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JNJ returned +132. 3% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 3966% more volatile than JNJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JNJ leads at 24. 9% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 7x for Prothena Corporation plc — 30. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTA: 80. 4% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ?
In this comparison, JNJ (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SYRE, ARRY, PRTA, RCUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYRE or ARRY or PRTA or RCUS or JNJ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 2% yield, +132. 3% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JNJ: +132. 3%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYRE and ARRY and PRTA and RCUS and JNJ?
These companies operate in different sectors (SYRE (Healthcare) and ARRY (Energy) and PRTA (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and JNJ (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SYRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JNJ is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JNJ pays a dividend while SYRE, ARRY, PRTA, RCUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.