Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Real Estate - Services
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $1M | $100M | $1.87B | $520M | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $40M | $472M | $351M | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-3M | $-50M | $88M | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 78.3% | 57.4% | 80.2% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -15.7% | -7.9% | -9.3% | 42.9% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 21.7x | 5.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $721K | $354M | $580M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $5M | $63M | $75M | $962M |
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 73.3 | -26.7% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAOP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.30
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.30, current ratio 2.09x
CCSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -20.6% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 21.7x)
- 25.1% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
- 13.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs -15.8%
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs TAOP's -78.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs TAOP's -78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs -15.8% |
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
TAOP leads 1 • OPEN leads 1 • AEYE leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 108.8x TAOP's $36M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $40M | $472M | $351M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$504,000 | -$12M | $164M | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$3M | -$50M | $88M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $2M | $44M | $112M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +78.3% | +57.4% | +80.2% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | -7.9% | -9.3% | +42.9% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | -7.6% | -10.6% | +25.1% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +5.5% | +9.4% | +32.0% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +7.9% | +28.9% | +1.5% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.7% | +29.0% | -22.7% | +21.5% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TAOP leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $100M | $1.9B | $520M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $96M | $2.2B | $1.0B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -32.36x | -37.89x | 6.50x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 21.69x | 4.99x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.07x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 2.49x | 4.20x | 1.49x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 20.91x | 5.00x | 39.95x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.09x | 4.92x | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCSI scores 5/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.7% | -47.8% | -14.0% | +52.9% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.7% | -9.5% | -5.9% | +13.2% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | -42.4% | -8.6% | +22.2% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.0% | -17.7% | -9.3% | +26.8% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.15x | 0.98x | 42.14x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$5M | $290M | $506M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $5M | $63M | $75M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $721,000 | $354M | $580M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.63x | -2.79x | -3.73x | 5.95x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCSI five years ago would be worth $7,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.8% | -18.7% | -23.1% | +30.2% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.3% | -27.9% | -37.8% | +26.8% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +20.6% | +41.1% | -21.8% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -60.2% | -54.9% | -20.6% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +102.2% | -59.5% | -20.6% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.9% | +6.4% | +12.2% | -7.9% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKT and CCSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCSI currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 2.29x | 1.30x | 1.51x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.10 | $16.39 | $31.66 | $31.66 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $5.31 | $14.11 | $19.24 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.4% | +49.4% | +55.1% | +89.3% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 61.3 | 50.9 | 51.0 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 194K | 1.9M | 123K | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALKT as "Buy", CCSI as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for ALKT (target: $22) vs -11.6% for CCSI (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $22.00 | $25.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | 0.0% |
CCSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TAOP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TAOP vs AEYE vs ALKT vs CCSI vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) delivered a total return of -20. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 137% more volatile than ALKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AudioEye, Inc. grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -32. 7% for Taoping Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -29. 0% for TAOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 16. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALKT: 26. 2% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TAOP or AEYE or ALKT or CCSI or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKT: -59. 5%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAOP and AEYE and ALKT and CCSI and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TAOP (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and ALKT (Technology) and CCSI (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.