Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TARS vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TARS vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $535M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-450M |
| Gross Margin | 90.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | — |
| Total Debt | $94M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $184M | $262M |
TARS vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 283.4 | +183.4% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 561.1 | +461.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TARS vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TARS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.65
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 27.3%, current ratio 3.85x
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs TARS's 210.8%
- 3.2% margin vs TARS's -9.0%
- +53.5% vs TARS's +35.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs NUVL's 1.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs TARS's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs NUVL's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs TARS's +35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.9% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC -23.4% vs -32.5% |
TARS vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TARS vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $535M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $535M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$49M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TARS and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.23x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.03x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.78x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS delivers a -14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-43 for NUVL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.4% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.6% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $184M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.76x | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,334 for TARS. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +53.5% total return vs TARS's +35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARS at 60.1% vs NUVL's 39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.1% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.3% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.3% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.8% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.1% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TARS and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TARS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVL's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs TARS's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.25 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.51 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TARS as "Buy" and NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 39.7% for TARS (target: $89).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.33 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TARS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TARS vs NUVL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TARS or NUVL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TARS or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to +113. 3% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus TARS's +210. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TARS or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Nuvalent, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning NUVL is approximately 68% more volatile than TARS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TARS or NUVL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TARS or NUVL?
Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUVL leads at 0. 0% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TARS or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TARS or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +210. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TARS: +210. 8%, NUVL: +446. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TARS and NUVL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.